Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for vs map to fill array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
for vs map
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
qty = 50; value = "lol";
Tests:
for
const arr = []; for (let i = 0; i < qty; i++) arr.push(value);
map
const arr = Array(3); arr.map(() => value);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining the benchmark. **What is tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, both designed to measure the performance difference between using a `for` loop and an array `map()` method in JavaScript. The test case uses a simple scenario where it creates an empty array and then fills it with 50 elements, each assigned the value `"lol"`. **Options compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **For loop**: A traditional `for` loop is used to iterate over the range of numbers from 0 to 49 (inclusive) and push the value `"lol"` onto the array. 2. **Map function**: The array `map()` method is used with an anonymous function that simply returns the value `"lol"`. This will apply the same transformation to each element in the array. **Pros and Cons of each approach** * **For loop**: + Pros: Can be more intuitive for some developers, as it clearly shows the iteration process. + Cons: Can lead to code bloat if not properly optimized (e.g., unnecessary variables or operations). * **Map function**: + Pros: Often faster and more concise than a `for` loop, especially when dealing with large datasets. + Cons: Can be less intuitive for some developers who are not familiar with the `map()` method. **Library** In this benchmark, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, it's likely that the test case uses the built-in JavaScript features and functions to perform the comparison. **Special JS feature or syntax** There is one special feature used in this benchmark: **let` and `const` declarations**. These keywords are used to declare variables with block scope, which helps prevent variable hoisting issues. **Other considerations** When writing benchmarks like this one, it's essential to consider the following: * Keep the test case simple and focused on the specific aspect being measured (in this case, performance difference between `for` loop and `map()`). * Use a consistent naming convention and formatting throughout the benchmark. * Ensure that the test case is representative of real-world use cases or scenarios. **Other alternatives** If you want to explore other approaches or optimizations for this benchmark, consider the following: * Using an array with a fixed length instead of creating it dynamically using `Array(qty)`. * Implementing the `for` loop and `map()` method with different optimization techniques (e.g., caching intermediate results or minimizing function call overhead). * Adding additional test cases to cover other aspects, such as memory allocation, garbage collection, or parallel processing.
Related benchmarks:
Array.from vs. Array/fill/map
for vs map
for vs map to fill array fixed
Array.from vs Array.fill Simple
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?