Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Slash Removal
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
EndsWith vs RegEx
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
path = 'Ends/with/a/slash/'
Tests:
EndsWith
path = path.endsWith('/') ? path.slice(0, -1) : path
RegEx
path = path.replace(/\/$/, '')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
EndsWith
RegEx
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript function that takes a string `path` as input and removes the trailing slash if present. The two possible approaches are: 1. **EndsWith**: This approach uses the `endsWith()` method, which returns a boolean indicating whether the string ends with the specified value. 2. **RegEx**: This approach uses a regular expression to match the trailing slash (`\\/$`) and replaces it with an empty string. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **EndsWith** * Pros: + Simple and straightforward implementation. + Easy to understand for developers familiar with the `endsWith()` method. * Cons: + May not be as efficient as using a regular expression, especially for large strings. + May not work correctly in all cases, such as when the input string is empty or null. 2. **RegEx** * Pros: + More efficient than using `endsWith()` for large strings. + Can handle more complex cases, such as removing multiple consecutive slashes. * Cons: + Requires a basic understanding of regular expressions, which can be challenging for some developers. + May be slower due to the overhead of compiling and executing the regex. **Other considerations** Both approaches have different performance characteristics. The `EndsWith` approach is likely to be faster than the `RegEx` approach because it uses a built-in method that is optimized for performance. However, the `RegEx` approach can handle more complex cases and may be preferred in certain situations. **Library and Special JS feature** Neither of the approaches relies on any external libraries or special JavaScript features beyond what is included in standard ECMAScript implementations. **Alternative approaches** Other possible approaches to removing trailing slashes from a string include: 1. **Using `slice()`**: `path = path.slice(0, -1)` (similar to `EndsWith`, but uses a different method) 2. **Using `replace()` with a negative lookahead**: `path = path.replace(/\/(?!\?)/g, '')` (uses a regular expression with a negative lookahead to exclude the `?` character from being replaced) These alternatives may have different performance characteristics and requirements for handling edge cases. In summary, the benchmark tests two approaches to removing trailing slashes from a string: using the `endsWith()` method and using a regular expression. The choice of approach depends on the specific use case and personal preference among developers.
Related benchmarks:
Take last part from URL (Regex vs split)
get last element of path: split vs regex
endsWith slice vs Regex replace
test path sanitize
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?