Benchmark: parseInt vs toString vs unary(+)

Script Preparation code:

var numbers = [1, 12, 123, 1234, 12345, 123456, 1234567, 12345678, 123456789];
var strNumbers = ["1", "12", "123", "1234", "12345", "123456", "1234567", "12345678", "123456789"];

Tests:

parseInt a number
numbers.forEach(n => parseInt(n, 10));
parseInt a string
strNumbers.forEach(n => parseInt(n, 10));
toString a number
numbers.forEach(n => n.toString());
toString a string
strNumbers.forEach(n => n.toString());
unery convert to number from number
numbers.forEach(n => +n);
unery convert to number from string
strNumbers.forEach(n => +n);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
parseInt a number
parseInt a string
toString a number
toString a string
unery convert to number from number
unery convert to number from string

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 133 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

parseInt a number

110.1M/s

unery convert to number from number

109.8M/s

toString a number

27.1M/s

toString a string

25.9M/s

unery convert to number from string

18.1M/s

parseInt a string

11.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ parseInt a number	110,082,160 Ops/sec
unery convert to number from number	109,841,088 Ops/sec
toString a number	27,112,506 Ops/sec
toString a string	25,938,566 Ops/sec
unery convert to number from string	18,087,460 Ops/sec
parseInt a string	11,379,526 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation.

**Benchmark Overview**

The MeasureThat.net benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different approaches for converting numbers and strings between two formats: numbers and strings. The test cases are:

1. `parseInt` (converting a number or string to an integer)
2. `toString` (converting a number to a string)
3. `unary+` (converting a number or string to a number, using the unary plus operator)

**Benchmark Options**

The benchmark compares the performance of each option in the following test cases:

* `parseInt`: converting numbers and strings to integers
* `toString`: converting numbers to strings
* `unary+`: converting numbers and strings to numbers (using the unary plus operator)

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

1. `parseInt`:
	* Pros: Simple, widely supported, and efficient for large integers.
	* Cons: May lose precision when converting very large or very small numbers.
2. `toString`:
	* Pros: Easy to implement, works well for small integers and strings.
	* Cons: Can be slower than `parseInt` for large integers and may not work as expected with certain edge cases (e.g., NaN values).
3. `unary+`:
	* Pros: Generally faster than `parseInt`, especially for strings, and can handle a wider range of input types.
	* Cons: May lose precision when converting very small or very large numbers.

**Library**

In the benchmark code, we notice that both arrays (`numbers` and `strNumbers`) are used to test each approach. The libraries used in this case are:

1. None (builtin JavaScript)
2. None (built-in JavaScript)

However, it's worth noting that if the test cases were using external libraries or dependencies, such as a parsing library for integers or a string manipulation library, those would need to be considered when interpreting the benchmark results.

**Special JS Features**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of three fundamental operations: `parseInt`, `toString`, and unary+.

**Alternatives**

For alternatives to MeasureThat.net, you can consider:

1.Benchmarking frameworks like Benchmark.js or js-benchmark.
2. Browser-specific performance comparison tools like Chrome DevTools' performance analysis.
3. Node.js built-in benchmarking modules like child_process's performance profiling capabilities.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different strengths and weaknesses compared to MeasureThat.net, but they can provide similar functionality for comparing JavaScript performance benchmarks.

parseInt vs toString vs unary(+) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `parseInt a number vs parseInt a string vs toString a number vs toString a string vs unery convert to number from number vs unery convert to number from string`

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

parseInt a number

parseInt a string

toString a number

toString a string

unery convert to number from number

unery convert to number from string

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

parseInt vs toString vs unary(+) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: parseInt a number vs parseInt a string vs toString a number vs toString a string vs unery convert to number from number vs unery convert to number from string

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

parseInt a number

parseInt a string

toString a number

toString a string

unery convert to number from number

unery convert to number from string

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `parseInt a number vs parseInt a string vs toString a number vs toString a string vs unery convert to number from number vs unery convert to number from string`