Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Check empty variable
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
a vs b vs c
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
a
typeof a === "undefined"
b
var b; b == null;
c
var b; b === undefined
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
b
c
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to help explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition provides a brief description of the test, but in this case, it's empty (`"Description": null`). This means that the test is likely focused on measuring the performance of JavaScript code, specifically related to variable checking. **Script Preparation Code and Html Preparation Code** These fields are also empty, which suggests that the benchmark is not dependent on any specific setup or environment. The script preparation code and HTML preparation code are often used to set up a test scenario, but in this case, they're likely not needed. **Individual Test Cases** There are three individual test cases: 1. `typeof a === "undefined"`: This test checks if the variable `a` is undefined using the `typeof` operator. 2. `var b; b == null;`: This test declares a variable `b`, assigns it no value, and then checks if `b` is equal to `null`. 3. `var b; b === undefined`: This test declares a variable `b`, assigns it no value, and then checks if `b` is equal to `undefined`. **Library Usage** None of the provided benchmarks use any external libraries. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. They're straightforward comparisons that can be easily executed by most JavaScript engines. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** The three test cases demonstrate different approaches to checking for undefined variables: * Test 1 uses the `typeof` operator, which is a built-in JavaScript function. This approach has the advantage of being concise and easy to read but may have some overhead due to the function call. * Test 2 explicitly assigns no value to `b`, then checks if it's equal to `null`. This approach might be slightly slower than using `typeof` because it involves an additional assignment operation. * Test 3 uses the `=== undefined` operator, which is a more idiomatic way to check for `undefined` in JavaScript. This approach has the advantage of being more concise and readable but may have some performance overhead due to the syntax. **Other Alternatives** Some other ways to check if a variable is undefined could include: * Using a custom function: `checkUndefined(a)` { return typeof a === 'undefined'; } * Using a conditional statement: `if (a !== undefined) { ... }` * Using a boolean expression: `(a || false)` However, the approaches used in Test 1, Test 2, and Test 3 are common and widely accepted ways to check for undefined variables in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Check if empty object is empty
Empty vs check
Is string empty
string empty literal vs length
empty string 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?