Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Associative object array VS array.find
(version: 0)
Get index of object vs Get array.find
Comparing performance of:
Get index of object vs Get array.find
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
o = {}; a = []; for (var i = 0; i<= 10000; i++){ a.push({'id' : ''+i, 'name' : 'name_'+i, 'firstname' : 'firstname_'+i}); o[''+i] = {'id' : ''+i, 'name' : 'name_'+i, 'firstname' : 'firstname_'+i} }
Tests:
Get index of object
name = o['1234'].name;
Get array.find
name = a.find(t => t.id == '1234');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Get index of object
Get array.find
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to retrieve an object from an associative array (object) versus an array using the `find` method: 1. **Associative Object Array**: The script creates an empty object (`o`) and an empty array (`a`). It then populates the array with 10,000 objects, each with `id`, `name`, and `firstname` properties. The script then attempts to retrieve an object by its `id` using the syntax `o['1234'].name;`. This approach uses a key lookup in the associative array. 2. **Array Find**: The script creates an empty array (`a`) and populates it with 10,000 objects, each with `id`, `name`, and `firstname` properties. The script then attempts to retrieve an object by its `id` using the `find` method with a callback function: `t => t.id == '1234'`. This approach uses the `find` method to search for an object that matches the specified condition. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Associative Object Array Lookup**: This approach uses a key lookup in the associative array to retrieve the desired object. 2. **Array Find Method**: This approach uses the `find` method with a callback function to search for an object that matches the specified condition. **Pros and Cons** **Associative Object Array Lookup** Pros: * Typically faster and more efficient, especially for small to medium-sized datasets * Can be more cache-friendly, as the entire associative array is loaded into memory Cons: * May not scale well for very large datasets, as it requires a significant amount of memory to store the entire associative array * Can be slower for arrays with many duplicate keys or key collisions **Array Find Method** Pros: * Can handle larger datasets and provides better performance for searching multiple conditions * Does not require loading the entire dataset into memory, making it more scalable Cons: * Typically slower than associative object array lookup for small to medium-sized datasets * May have higher overhead due to the use of a callback function and iterating over the array **Library Usage** The `Array.prototype.find()` method is a standard JavaScript method that searches for an element in an array that satisfies a provided testing function. In this benchmark, it's used with a callback function to search for an object that matches the specified condition. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two different approaches to retrieving an object from an associative array versus an array. **Alternative Approaches** Other alternatives to these two options might include: 1. **Using a map (or dictionary) instead of an associative array**: This could potentially provide better performance and scalability for large datasets. 2. **Using a more efficient data structure, such as a trie or suffix tree**: These data structures are optimized for fast lookups and may provide better performance than the current options. 3. **Caching or memoization**: Caching or memoizing the results of previous lookups could potentially improve performance by avoiding repeated computations. However, these alternatives might not be relevant to this specific benchmark, which is focused on comparing two simple approaches to retrieving an object from an associative array versus an array using the `find` method.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.find vs Lodash find 2
Array .push() vs .unshift() multiple
IndexOf vs Includes vs find
Array.forEach vs Object.keys().forEach
find vs includes vs indexof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?