Benchmark: Includes vs. IndexOf vs. Filter vs. Find vs. FindIndex vs. Some

Script Preparation code:

var hasZero = [];
var withoutZero = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
  hasZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000));
  withoutZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000) + 1)
}

Tests:

Includes
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.includes(v => v === 0);
IndexOf
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.indexOf(0) > -1 : withoutZero.indexOf(0) > -1;
Filter
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.filter(v => v === 0);
Find
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.find(v => v === 0);
FindIndex
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.findIndex(v => v === 0);
Some
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.some(v => v === 0);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Includes
IndexOf
Filter
Find
FindIndex
Some

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:131.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/131.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 131 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Includes	157194.0 Ops/sec
IndexOf	202608.4 Ops/sec
Filter	38636.7 Ops/sec
Find	40651.1 Ops/sec
FindIndex	35463.8 Ops/sec
Some	27632.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Includes vs. IndexOf vs. Filter vs. Find vs. FindIndex vs. Some (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Includes vs IndexOf vs Filter vs Find vs FindIndex vs Some

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Includes

IndexOf

Filter

Find

FindIndex

Some

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A