Benchmark: Select n - MeasureThat.net

Select n (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Destructuring with defaults, empty input vs Selectn get, empty input vs Destructuring with defaults, find item vs Selectn get, find item vs Destructuring null input vs Selectn null input vs Destructuring undefined input vs Lodash undefined input vs Destructuring dynamic key vs Lodash dynamic key

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://unpkg.com/selectn/selectn.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function destructuringFn(input) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function destructuringFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { [key]: documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function selectnFn(input) {
  const documents = selectn(input, 'contextMenu.data.documents', []);
  return documents;
}

function selectnFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const documents = selectn(input, `contextMenu.data.${key}`, []);
  return documents;
}

function test(fn, input, key) {
  fn(input, key);
}

Tests:

Destructuring with defaults, empty input
test(destructuringFn, {});
Selectn get, empty input
test(selectnFn, {});
Destructuring with defaults, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input);
Selectn get, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(selectnFn, input);
Destructuring null input
test(destructuringFn, null);
Selectn null input
test(selectnFn, null);
Destructuring undefined input
let input; test(destructuringFn, input);
Lodash undefined input
let input; test(selectnFn, input);
Destructuring dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input, 'documents');
Lodash dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(selectnFn, input, 'documents');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Destructuring with defaults, empty input
Selectn get, empty input
Destructuring with defaults, find item
Selectn get, find item
Destructuring null input
Selectn null input
Destructuring undefined input
Lodash undefined input
Destructuring dynamic key
Lodash dynamic key

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test suite, specifically designed to compare the performance of two libraries: `select` (a custom implementation) and `lodash` (the well-known utility library).

**Test Scenarios**

There are eight test scenarios:

1. `Destructuring with defaults`
2. `Destructuring with find item`
3. `Destructuring dynamic key`
4. `Lodash undefined input`
5. `Select null input`
6. `Select get empty input`
7. `Select get find item input`
8. `Lodash dynamic key`

Each scenario tests a specific use case, such as destructuring objects with default values or using the `select` function to retrieve specific properties.

**Performance Results**

The benchmarking results show the execution speed (in executions per second) for each test scenario across different browsers and platforms. The top-performing scenarios are:

1. `Destructuring dynamic key`
2. `Select get find item input`

The other scenarios have lower performance, with some cases resulting in 0 executions per second.

**Library Comparison**

Comparing the performance of `select` and `lodash`, we can see that:

* `select` performs better than `lodash` in most cases.
* `Destructuring dynamic key` and `Select get find item input` are among the top-performing scenarios for both libraries.

However, it's essential to note that this benchmarking results might not be representative of real-world usage scenarios, as they may not account for edge cases or other factors that can affect performance in a production environment.

Related benchmarks: