Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Remove first position from array
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Unshift vs Concat vs Spread
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = Array.from(Array(1000).keys())
Tests:
Unshift
array.unshift(0);
Concat
array = array.concat([0])
Spread
array = [0, ...array]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Unshift
Concat
Spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition provides the base script that will be executed to test the performance of different array manipulation techniques. In this case, the script initializes an array with 1000 elements using `Array.from(Array(1000).keys())`. **Options being compared** Three options are being compared: 1. **Unshift**: This method adds one or more elements to the beginning of an array. 2. **Concat**: This method creates a new array by concatenating another array (or arrays) with the existing array. 3. **Spread**: This syntax uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array from the elements of the original array, starting from the specified position. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Unshift**: * Pros: Efficient for adding elements to the beginning of an array, as it only requires updating the internal array buffer. * Cons: Can be slower due to the overhead of searching and inserting elements at the correct position. 2. **Concat**: * Pros: Simple and widely supported, as it uses a standard method in most browsers. * Cons: Creates a new array, which can lead to memory allocation and copying issues for large arrays. 3. **Spread**: * Pros: Fast and efficient, as it only requires creating a new array with the desired elements. * Cons: Requires support for the spread operator, which may not be available in older browsers. **Library usage** None of the options explicitly use any libraries or external dependencies. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript implementations (e.g., V8) have built-in optimizations and micro-optimizations that can affect performance. **Special JS feature or syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It allows for creating new arrays by spreading elements from an existing array. This syntax is not supported in older browsers or environments that don't have the latest ECMAScript standard. **Alternative approaches** Other alternatives for modifying an array include: * Using `Array.prototype.splice()` to insert or remove elements at a specific position. * Creating a new array using `Array.from()` and then modifying it (e.g., `new Array(array.length).fill(0).splice(0, 1)`). * Implementing custom solutions that use bitwise operations, indexing, or other low-level techniques. Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project. MeasureThat.net provides a useful benchmarking platform to compare performance across different options.
Related benchmarks:
Slice vs Splice vs Shift (100)
Slice vs Splice vs Shiftxxxxxx
Splice vs shift to remove at beginning of array (fixed from slice)
Slice vs Splice vs Shift 231
Empty array: Splice vs Shift
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?