Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 3
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var max2 = 1000000; // 100,000,000 (100 Million) var data = []; for (var i = 0; i <= max2; i++) { data.push({ id: i }); }
Tests:
Lodash
_.groupBy(data, ({ id }) => id)
Native
data.reduce((acc, item) => { acc[item.id] = item; return acc; }, {})
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what is tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The test case uses two different approaches to implement grouping data: Lodash's `groupBy` function and native JavaScript's `reduce` method. The script preparation code generates an array of 1 million objects with a unique `id` property. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of: 1. **Lodash's `groupBy`**: A popular utility library for functional programming in JavaScript. 2. **Native JavaScript's `reduce`**: A built-in method for reducing arrays to a single value. **Pros and Cons** **Lodash's `groupBy`:** Pros: * Highly optimized and tested by a large community * Provides a simple, concise way to group data * Reduces boilerplate code Cons: * Introduces an external dependency (the Lodash library) * May have slower startup time due to the need to load the library * Not as efficient as native JavaScript's `reduce` method for very large datasets **Native JavaScript's `reduce`:** Pros: * No external dependencies or overhead * Optimized for performance by Google and other browser vendors * Can be more efficient than Lodash's `groupBy` for very large datasets Cons: * Requires a good understanding of the `reduce` method and its limitations * May not be as concise or readable for some developers * May have slower startup time due to the need to parse the code and execute it in the browser. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array manipulation, and functional programming. The `groupBy` function is one of its most commonly used features, allowing developers to easily group data based on a specified property. **Special JS feature or syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. Both Lodash's `groupBy` and native JavaScript's `reduce` methods use standard JavaScript concepts. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative ways to group data, here are a few options: 1. **Array.prototype.reduce() with an object**: You can create an object to accumulate the results of each iteration and return it at the end. 2. **For...of loop**: You can use a for...of loop to iterate over the array and accumulate the results in an object. 3. **D3.js's `groupBy` function**: D3.js is a popular data visualization library that provides a `groupBy` function similar to Lodash's. 4. **Papaparse's `groupBy` function**: Papaparse is a library for parsing CSV and JSON files, which also includes a `groupBy` function. Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own strengths and weaknesses, and may not be as optimized or widely tested as Lodash's `groupBy` function.
Related benchmarks:
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce (1mln)
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce (2)
lodas2 groupBy vs Array.reduce
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce on million items
lodash groupBy vs Array.reduce 100k with array push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?