Benchmark: v + o + d - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<style>
  .modal{transition:.2s; display:block; opacity:1; visibility:visible;}
  .modal.o{opacity:0;}
  .modal.v{visibility:hidden;}
  .modal.d{display:none;}
</style>
<div class="modal" data-modal="modal1">
  <div class="modal-dialog">
    <div class="modal-content">
      <div class="modal-header bg-red">
        <div class="modal-title">Example Modal</div>
        <div class="modal-tools">
          <div class="dropdown">
            <button class="btn btn-neutral dropdown-toggle">Options</button>
            <div class="dropdown-panel">
              <a href="#" class="dropdown-item">Addendum Vitae Consectetum</a>
              <a href="#" class="dropdown-item">Edit</a>
              <a href="#" class="dropdown-item">Delete</a>
            </div>
          </div>

          <button class="btn btn-neutral modal-closer">
            <i class="far fa-times"></i>
          </button>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="modal-body">
        <p data-fill="50"></p>
      </div>
      <div class="modal-footer">
        <button class="btn btn-default modal-closer mr-2">Close</button>
        <button class="btn btn-primary">Save</button>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</div>

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>

Tests:

d
$(".modal").toggleClass("d");
v
$(".modal").toggleClass("v");
o
$(".modal").toggleClass("o");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
d
v
o

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

To analyze the provided JSON, I'll break down what's being tested and compare different approaches.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is represented by a JSON object with three properties:

*   `Name`: A unique identifier for the benchmark ("v + o + d").
*   `Description` and `Script Preparation Code` are empty, which means there's no description or initial script setup required for this benchmark.
*   `Html Preparation Code` defines an HTML structure for a modal window with a dropdown menu.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark consists of three test cases, each defined by another JSON object:

1.  **Test Case "d"`: The benchmark definition is "$(\".modal\").toggleClass(\"d\");", which toggles the class "d" on the element with the CSS selector ".modal".
2.  **Test Case "v"`: The benchmark definition is "$(\".modal\").toggleClass(\"v\");", which toggles the class "v" on the element with the CSS selector ".modal".
3.  **Test Case "o"`: The benchmark definition is "$(\".modal\").toggleClass(\"o\");", which toggles the class "o" on the element with the CSS selector ".modal".

**Comparison of Approaches**

These test cases compare three different approaches to toggle classes on a specific HTML element:

*   **Toggle Class**: Toggling a class directly on an element using the `toggleClass` method. This is a common approach in JavaScript and jQuery.
    *   Pros:
        *   Easy to implement and understand.
        *   Fast execution speed.
    *   Cons:
        *   May lead to performance issues if not used carefully (e.g., toggling too many classes at once).
*   **Nested CSS Selectors**: Using nested CSS selectors like `.modal .dropdown .dropdown-item` to target specific elements. This can be useful when working with complex HTML structures.
    *   Pros:
        *   More precise control over which elements are affected.
    *   Can reduce DOM manipulation overhead.
    *   Cons:
        *   May lead to slower execution speeds due to the increased selector complexity.
*   **CSS Class Names**: Using CSS class names like `.v`, `.o`, and `.d` directly on the element without using JavaScript. This approach can be useful when working with simple HTML structures or when performance is critical.
    *   Pros:
        *   Fastest execution speed (no JavaScript overhead).
        *   Can reduce DOM manipulation overhead.
    *   Cons:
        *   Requires manual maintenance of CSS class names and their effects.

**Libraries and Special Features**

The benchmark definition includes a reference to jQuery, which is a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation. The `toggleClass` method is a part of jQuery's API.

If test cases use some special JS feature or syntax, there are none mentioned in the provided JSON.

**Other Alternatives**

For this specific benchmark, other alternatives could include:

*   **Vanilla JavaScript**: Implementing the same functionality using pure JavaScript without any libraries.
*   **React or Vue.js**: Using a React or Vue.js framework to manage the DOM updates and class toggling.
*   **CSS Animations**: Using CSS animations to achieve the desired visual effects instead of JavaScript.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might require different approaches to implementation and might not be as efficient or easy to understand for all cases.

Related benchmarks:

v + o + d (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: d vs v vs o

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

d

v

o

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):