Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operator new object (fixed)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches for creating a new object: `Object.assign` and the spread operator (`{ ...params }`). The test is designed to measure the performance difference between these two methods on a fixed input dataset. **Approaches Compared** There are two approaches being compared: 1. **`Object.assign`**: This method takes multiple arguments and merges them into a new object. In this benchmark, `Object.assign` is used to merge an existing object (`{ a: 2 }`) with a new set of properties (`params`). 2. **Spread Operator (`{ ...params }`)**: This syntax creates a new object by copying the properties from `params` and merging them into the existing object (`{ a: 2 }`). **Pros and Cons** **`Object.assign`**: Pros: * Widely supported across browsers * Can be used with older versions of JavaScript that don't support the spread operator Cons: * Can be slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of function calls * May require more code to create a new object, depending on the number of properties being merged **Spread Operator (`{ ...params }`)**: Pros: * Faster and more concise than `Object.assign` * Is a modern JavaScript feature that's widely supported across browsers (including Chrome 83) Cons: * Not supported in older versions of JavaScript * Requires a specific syntax, which may be unfamiliar to some developers **Library Usage** In this benchmark, no libraries are used. The test only involves native JavaScript features. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The spread operator (`{ ...params }`) is a modern JavaScript feature that's introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES8). It allows for concise object creation by copying properties from an existing object or array. **Other Considerations** When choosing between `Object.assign` and the spread operator, consider the following: * Performance: If speed is critical, the spread operator may be a better choice due to its conciseness and reduced overhead. * Code readability: If code readability is more important than performance, `Object.assign` may be preferred due to its explicit nature. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches for creating a new object could include: * Using a library like Lodash or underscore.js * Using the `Object.create()` method * Using a template literal (e.g., `const obj = { ... }`)
Related benchmarks:
Spread vs Object.assign (modify ) vs Object.assign (new)
object.assign vs spread to create a copy
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance without useless assignment
JavaScript spread operator vs Object.assign performance - Kien Nguyen
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?