Benchmark: includes() vs multiple && / ||

Tests:

Simple condition operator
const target = 100; if (target === 1 || target === 2 || target === 3 || target === 4 || target === 5 || target === 6 || target === 7 || target === 8 || target === 9 || target === 10 || target === 11 || target === 12 || target === 13 || target === 14 || target === 15 || target === 16 || target === 17 || target === 18 || target === 19 || target === 20 || target === 21 || target === 22 || target === 23 || target === 24 || target === 25 || target === 26 || target === 27 || target === 28 || target === 29 || target === 30 || target === 31 || target === 32 || target === 33 || target === 34 || target === 35 || target === 36 || target === 37 || target === 38 || target === 39 || target === 40 || target === 41 || target === 42 || target === 43 || target === 44 || target === 45 || target === 46 || target === 47 || target === 48 || target === 49 || target === 50 || target === 51 || target === 52 || target === 53 || target === 54 || target === 55 || target === 56 || target === 57 || target === 58 || target === 59 || target === 60 || target === 61 || target === 62 || target === 63 || target === 64 || target === 65 || target === 66 || target === 67 || target === 68 || target === 69 || target === 70 || target === 71 || target === 72 || target === 73 || target === 74 || target === 75 || target === 76 || target === 77 || target === 78 || target === 79 || target === 80 || target === 81 || target === 82 || target === 83 || target === 84 || target === 85 || target === 86 || target === 87 || target === 88 || target === 89 || target === 90 || target === 91 || target === 92 || target === 93 || target === 94 || target === 95 || target === 96 || target === 97 || target === 98 || target === 99 || target === 100) { console.log('Found'); }
includes function
const target = 100; if ([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100].includes(target)) { console.log('Found'); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Simple condition operator
includes function

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is defined as follows:

* `Name`: The name of the benchmark, which is "includes() vs multiple && / ||".
* `Description`: An empty description.
* `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These are left blank, indicating that no specific code needs to be prepared for the benchmark.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Simple condition operator**: This test case uses a traditional if-else statement with multiple conditions to check if a number is within a certain range (1-100). The goal is to compare the performance of this approach with...
2. **includes function**: ...the `includes()` method, which checks if an array contains a specific value.

**What's being tested**

The benchmark tests the performance difference between using a simple condition operator (with multiple AND and OR operations) versus the `includes()` method when checking if a value is within an array.

**Options compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **Simple condition operator**: This approach uses multiple conditions (AND and OR operations) to check if the number is within the range.
2. **includes function**: This approach uses the `includes()` method to check if the number is in the array.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

Here's a brief summary:

* **Simple condition operator**:
	+ Pros: Easy to understand, no additional dependencies required.
	+ Cons: Can be slower due to the multiple checks.
* **includes function**:
	+ Pros: Generally faster than traditional if-else statements, especially for large arrays.
	+ Cons: Requires an array and a specific value to check against.

**Latest Benchmark Result**

The latest benchmark result shows that:

* The `includes()` method is slightly faster than the simple condition operator.

Based on this information, it's clear that using the `includes()` method can be a more efficient approach when checking if a value is within an array. However, it's worth noting that the actual performance difference may depend on various factors, such as the size of the array and the specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

includes() vs multiple && / || (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Simple condition operator vs includes function

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Simple condition operator

includes function

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):