Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash sumBy vs forEach
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_.sumBy vs foreach
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max)); } var arr = []; for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)}); }
Tests:
_.sumBy
_.sumBy(arr,"value");
foreach
let result = 0; arr.forEach(element => { result += element.value }); return result;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.sumBy
foreach
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **Overview** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using Lodash's `sumBy` function and using a traditional `forEach` loop to sum up values in an array. The test creates a large array of objects with random integer values and then uses each approach to calculate the total sum. **Options compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Lodash's `sumBy`**: This is a higher-order function that applies a given callback function to each element of an array, while also accumulating the results. 2. **Traditional `forEach` loop**: This involves iterating over each element in the array using a `forEach` loop and adding up the values manually. **Pros and Cons** * **Lodash's `sumBy`**: + Pros: concise and expressive code, eliminates the need for manual iteration and sum calculation. + Cons: requires the presence of Lodash library, may incur additional overhead due to function call and object lookups. * **Traditional `forEach` loop**: + Pros: lightweight, no external dependencies required, straightforward and easy to understand. + Cons: more verbose code, requires manual iteration and sum calculation, which can be error-prone. **Library usage** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash's `sumBy` function is used to simplify the process of calculating the sum of an array by applying a callback function to each element. **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark code. However, it's worth noting that the use of `let const` and arrow functions (`=>`) is a relatively modern feature of ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and later versions. **Benchmark preparation code** The preparation code creates an array of objects with random integer values using a helper function `getRandomInt`. This helps ensure that the test results are consistent across different runs. **Other alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to this benchmark, here are some other options: * Using a library like Ramda or Underscore.js, which provide similar functionality to Lodash. * Implementing the `sumBy` function manually using recursion or iteration. * Using a different array manipulation approach, such as using `reduce()` or `map()`. * Optimizing the code for specific use cases, such as using SIMD instructions for numerical computations. Keep in mind that each alternative may have its own trade-offs and considerations, and some may be more suitable than others depending on your specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash sumBy vs for
Lodash sumBy vs forEach vs for
Lodash sumBy vs forEach vs for 2
Lodash.isArray vs Array.isArray (Lodash v4.17.15)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?