Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operator - 1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The test compares two approaches to merge objects in JavaScript: 1. `Object.assign()` 2. The spread operator (`...`) The test creates two objects, `params` and `other`, using both methods. The resulting object is stored in a variable named `other`. **Options Compared** * `Object.assign()` vs. Spread Operator + **Pros of Object.assign():** - Widely supported across browsers and older JavaScript versions. - Can be used to merge objects with existing properties, allowing for more flexibility. - Can be used with other methods like `merge()` or `concat()` to create a new object. + **Cons of Object.assign():** - Requires an existing object to merge into (i.e., the first argument). - Can be slower due to its method call and loop iterations under the hood. **Pros of Spread Operator:** * Simple, concise syntax for creating new objects. * Works with newer JavaScript versions that support it. * Allows for more readable code by explicitly stating which properties are being copied or merged. **Cons of Spread Operator:** * Not widely supported across older browsers and versions (e.g., Internet Explorer). * Limited control over the merging process compared to `Object.assign()`. **Library/Features Used:** None, this benchmark focuses on JavaScript core language features. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** The spread operator (`...`) was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It's a shorthand way to create new objects by copying properties from an existing object or array. **Other Alternatives:** Before the spread operator, developers used various techniques to achieve similar results: 1. `JSON.parse()` and `JSON.stringify()`: Not suitable for all cases, as it only works with JSON data. 2. Loops (`for...in` or `forEach()`) and object properties access (`obj.property = obj[property]`): Less readable and error-prone. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show that the spread operator outperforms `Object.assign()` in terms of execution frequency (ExecutionsPerSecond). However, this might be due to specific implementation details or optimizations within Chrome 83, as browsers may have varying performance characteristics.
Related benchmarks:
toFixed -> Number vs Math.round
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
toFixed() vs String(Math.floor()
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
toFixed vs Math.round vs |(bitwise or)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?