Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
match vs exec #2
(version: 2)
for multiple cases, registry
Comparing performance of:
exec vs match vs exec case
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function findAll(regexPattern, sourceString) { let output = [] let match // make sure the pattern has the global flag let regexPatternWithGlobal = RegExp(regexPattern,"gi") while (match = regexPatternWithGlobal.exec(sourceString)) { // get rid of the string copy delete match.input // store the match data output.push(match) } return output } function findAllCase(regexPattern, sourceString) { let output = [] let match // make sure the pattern has the global flag let regexPatternWithGlobal = RegExp(regexPattern,"gi") while (match = regexPatternWithGlobal.exec(sourceString)) { // get rid of the string copy delete match.input // store the match data output.push(match) } return output } var find = 'a'; var str = 'asdqwe'.repeat(10000);
Tests:
exec
findAll(find, str);
match
str.match(RegExp(find, 'gi'));
exec case
findAllCase(find, str);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
exec
match
exec case
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark tests three different approaches to find all occurrences of a pattern in a string: 1. `findAll` function: This function iterates over the input string using a regular expression with the global flag (`gi`) set, collecting all matches into an array. 2. String method `match`: This method returns an array of matches for the first occurrence of the pattern in the string. 3. `findAllCase` function: Similar to `findAll`, but with a different implementation. **Comparison** The benchmark compares these three approaches: * `findAll` and `findAllCase` are similar, as they both use the global flag in their regular expressions and iterate over the input string to collect matches. However, `findAllCase` might have a slight performance advantage due to its more optimized implementation. * `match` is significantly slower than `findAll` and `findAllCase`, likely because it only returns the first match instead of iterating over the entire input string. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: * `findAll` and `findAllCase`: + Pros: Fast, efficient, and reliable. + Cons: May be slower than `match` due to the global flag requirement. * `match`: + Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and suitable for most use cases. + Cons: Slower, as it only returns the first match. **Library** The benchmark uses regular expressions (RegExp), which are a built-in JavaScript library. Regular expressions provide an efficient way to search and manipulate text patterns in strings. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None of the approaches use any special JavaScript features or syntax that's not widely supported. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches, here are some options: * `String.prototype.replace`: Instead of finding all occurrences, you can use `replace` to replace all matches with a new string. This approach is more suitable when you need to modify the input string instead of just extracting matches. * `Array.prototype.some` or `Array.prototype.every`: You can use these methods to check if any element in an array matches a condition. However, this approach is not as efficient as regular expressions for finding all occurrences. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be suitable for every use case, and the performance characteristics may vary depending on the specific requirements.
Related benchmarks:
RegEx.exec vs String.match
match vs exec with many matches
RegEx.exec vs regex.test
RegEx.exec vs String.match (inline)
RegExp.exec vs String.match vs RegExp.test vs RegExp.match
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?