Benchmark: _.compact vs array.filter

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var array = [undefined, 'cat', false, 434, '', 32.0]

Tests:

_.compact
_.compact(array)
array.filter
array.filter(Boolean)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.compact
array.filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 129 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

_.compact

5.4M/s

array.filter

5.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ _.compact	5,356,424 Ops/sec
array.filter	5,353,179 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark tests the performance of two approaches to remove `undefined` values from an array: the `_.compact()` function from the Lodash library, and the `array.filter(Boolean)` method.

**Options compared**

There are two options being compared:

1. **_.compact()**: This function returns a new array with all elements removed that are equal to `undefined`.
2. **Array.prototype.filter(Boolean)**: This method creates a new array with all elements that pass the test implemented by the provided function.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

**_.compact()**

Pros:

* More concise and readable code
* Lodash library provides a well-maintained and widely-used implementation

Cons:

* May have additional overhead due to the use of a separate library
* May not be as well-optimized for performance compared to native JavaScript methods

**Array.prototype.filter(Boolean)**

Pros:

* Native JavaScript method, potentially more efficient and lightweight
* Does not require an external library

Cons:

* More verbose code
* Requires understanding of the `Boolean` context function in JavaScript

**Other considerations**

Both approaches can be effective, but the choice between them depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. If readability and convenience are more important than raw performance, _.compact() might be a better choice. However, if every ounce of performance counts, using native JavaScript methods like `filter(Boolean)` could be a better option.

**Library explanation**

The Lodash library is a popular collection of functional programming utilities in JavaScript. It provides many useful functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object iteration, and more. In this benchmark, the `_.compact()` function is used to remove `undefined` values from an array.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark. The code snippets provided use standard JavaScript syntax and methods.

**Benchmark preparation code explanation**

The script preparation code creates an array with `undefined` values, which will be used as input for both tests: `_.compact()` and `array.filter(Boolean)`.

_.compact vs array.filter (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `_.compact vs array.filter`

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

_.compact

array.filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

_.compact vs array.filter (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: _.compact vs array.filter

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

_.compact

array.filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `_.compact vs array.filter`