Benchmark: delete vs null vs undefined vs void 0 vs Object.create(null) v2

Tests:

null
var a = 999; for(var i = 0; i < 1000;i++) { a = null; }
undefined
var a = 999; for(var i = 0; i < 1000;i++) { a = undefined; }
Object.create(null)
var a = 999; for(var i = 0; i < 1000;i++) { a = Object.create(null); }
void 0
var a = 999; for(var i = 0; i < 1000;i++) { a = void 0; }
delete
var a = 999; for(var i = 0; i < 1000;i++) { delete a; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
null
undefined
Object.create(null)
void 0
delete

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Whale/3.5.3.2 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

delete

2.0M/s

void 0

2.0M/s

null

1.9M/s

undefined

6K/s

Object.create(null)

5K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ delete	1,959,101 Ops/sec
void 0	1,957,974 Ops/sec
null	1,909,970 Ops/sec
undefined	6,390 Ops/sec
Object.create(null)	5,487 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the provided benchmark definition and explain what is tested, compared, and considered.

**Benchmark Definition**

The website measures the performance of four different approaches to delete or unset variables in JavaScript:

1. `delete` (deletion)
2. `null`
3. `undefined`
4. `void 0` (equivalent to `undefined`)
5. `Object.create(null)` (creation of a new object with no prototype)

These approaches are compared in the context of assigning a value to a variable and then deleting or unsetting it.

**Options Compared**

The options compared can be summarized as follows:

* **Deletion (`delete`)**: Directly deletes the variable from memory.
* **Null (`null`)**: Assigns `null` to the variable, which does not affect the variable's existence in memory but marks its last use.
* **Undefined (`undefined`)**: Assigns `undefined` to the variable, similar to null, but it is considered undefined by JavaScript and can be detected using various methods (e.g., `typeof`, `isNaN`).
* **Void 0 (`void 0`)**: Similar to `undefined`, but some browsers might optimize this to a null check due to its similarity in appearance.
* **Object.create(null)`**: Creates a new object with no prototype chain, which can be used to unset the variable without deleting it from memory. However, this approach is slower compared to direct deletion.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons for each option:

1. **Deletion (`delete`)**:
	* Fastest ( O(1) )
	* Most efficient
	* Does not preserve variable's memory location
2. **Null (`null`)**:
	* Faster than `undefined`
	* Preserves variable's memory location (can be accessed using `in`)
3. **Undefined (`undefined`)**:
	* Similar to null, but detectable using various methods
	* Slower than deletion and null assignments
4. **Void 0 (`void 0`)**:
	* May be optimized to a null check in some browsers
	* Unpredictable performance due to browser optimizations
5. **Object.create(null)`**:
	* Preserves variable's memory location (can be accessed using `in`)
	* Slower than direct deletion and null assignments

**Special JavaScript Features**

The test cases use special JavaScript features, including:

1. `delete`: Directly deletes the variable.
2. `typeof` and `isNaN`: Used to detect if a variable is undefined or not.

These features are used within the benchmark definition to compare the performance of each option.

**Other Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches that could be considered in this benchmark include:

1. Using `delete` on an object property instead of a global variable.
2. Using a WeakMap or WeakSet to store variables and then deleting them.
3. Using a different data structure, such as an array, to store variables and then deleting them.

However, these alternatives are not included in the provided benchmark definition and would require additional setup and testing.

Overall, this benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance characteristics of different approaches to delete or unset variables in JavaScript, helping developers make informed decisions when working with these features.

delete vs null vs undefined vs void 0 vs Object.create(null) v2 (version: 0)

delete vs null vs undefined vs void 0 vs Object.create(null)

Comparing performance of: `null vs undefined vs Object.create(null) vs void 0 vs delete`

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

null

undefined

Object.create(null)

void 0

delete

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

delete vs null vs undefined vs void 0 vs Object.create(null) v2 (version: 0)

delete vs null vs undefined vs void 0 vs Object.create(null)

Comparing performance of: null vs undefined vs Object.create(null) vs void 0 vs delete

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

null

undefined

Object.create(null)

void 0

delete

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `null vs undefined vs Object.create(null) vs void 0 vs delete`