Benchmark: spread vs spread push vs concat vs push.apply

Script Preparation code:


var first = ['1', '2', '3'];
var second = ['4', '5', '6'];

Tests:

Spread
first = [...first, ...second]
Push spread
first.push(...second)
Concat
first.concat(second)
Push apply
first.push.apply(first, second)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Spread
Push spread
Concat
Push apply

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks.

**Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run microbenchmarks for JavaScript. The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which includes the test cases, script preparation code, and HTML preparation code (none in this case). The latest benchmark results show the performance comparison between different approaches: `Spread`, `Push spread`, `Concat`, and `Push apply`.

**What is tested**

In this benchmark, four different approaches are compared:

1. **`Spread`**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to concatenate two arrays.
2. **`Push spread`**: Pushing an array onto another array using the spread operator (`...`).
3. **`Concat`**: Concatenating two arrays using the `concat()` method.
4. **`Push apply`**: Pushing an array onto another array using the `apply()` method.

**Options comparison**

Here's a brief overview of each approach, their pros and cons:

1. **`Spread`**:
	* Pros: Concise and efficient way to concatenate arrays.
	* Cons: Can be slower than other methods for large datasets due to the overhead of creating new arrays.
2. **`Push spread`**:
	* Pros: Simple and straightforward way to append elements to an array.
	* Cons: Creates a new copy of the original array, which can lead to performance issues for large datasets.
3. **`Concat`**:
	* Pros: Supports concatenation with other methods (e.g., `concat()`).
	* Cons: Can be slower than spread-based approaches due to the overhead of creating new arrays.
4. **`Push apply`**:
	* Pros: Similar performance characteristics to push-based approaches, but provides more flexibility in terms of array manipulation.
	* Cons: Less intuitive for some developers, as it requires understanding the `apply()` method.

**Library usage**

None of the test cases use any external libraries or frameworks. The focus is solely on comparing the different JavaScript operators and methods.

**Special JS features or syntax**

The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`) in a few test cases, which is a relatively recent addition to the JavaScript language (introduced in ECMAScript 2018). This feature allows for concise array concatenation and spreading of elements into arrays.

Other considerations:

* The `push()` method and `concat()` method are both widely supported by most modern browsers.
* The `apply()` method is also widely supported, but its usage can be less intuitive for some developers.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative approaches or alternatives to these methods, consider the following:

1. **Array.prototype.reduce()**: A more functional approach to concatenating arrays using a reduce callback function.
2. **Buffer concatenation**: Using `Buffer.concat()` (for Node.js environments) or `concat()` (in browser environments) to concatenate buffers.
3. **Native array operations**: Some browsers provide native array operations, such as `Array.prototype.set()`, which can be used for efficient concatenation.

These alternatives may offer better performance or more concise syntax but are not part of the standard JavaScript language and may require specific implementations depending on the environment.

Related benchmarks:

spread vs spread push vs concat vs push.apply (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Spread vs Push spread vs Concat vs Push apply

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Spread

Push spread

Concat

Push apply

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):