Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs JSON stringify
(version: 0)
Spread vs JSON stringify
Comparing performance of:
Object spread vs JSON.stringify
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a = Array(1000).fill().map(() => Math.round(Math.random() * 40));
Tests:
Object spread
console.log(`${[...a]}`)
JSON.stringify
console.log(JSON.stringify(a))
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object spread
JSON.stringify
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to create an array from an existing one: using the `...` spread operator (also known as the "spread syntax") versus `JSON.stringify()`. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Object Spread (`[...a]`)**: This method uses the spread syntax to create a new array by iterating over the elements of the original array `a`. The `Math.random() * 40` expression is used to generate random numbers for each element in the array. 2. **JSON.stringify()`**: This method converts the original array `a` into a JSON string and then parses it back into an array using the `JSON.parse()` method. **Pros and Cons** * **Object Spread (`[...a]`)**: + Pros: lightweight, simple to implement, and flexible. + Cons: may not be suitable for large datasets due to potential memory issues and performance overhead from parsing the JSON string. * **JSON.stringify()`**: + Pros: widely supported, can handle large datasets, and provides a clear and human-readable representation of the data. + Cons: may incur additional overhead due to parsing and stringification operations, which can impact performance. **Library Used** None in this specific benchmark. The `JSON` library is used implicitly by the `JSON.stringify()` method, but it's not explicitly imported or referenced in the benchmark code. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax** The benchmark uses a modern JavaScript feature: spread syntax (`[...a]`). This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and has been widely adopted since then. The `Math.random()` expression is also used, which is a common pattern for generating random numbers in JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to compare other approaches, here are a few alternatives: * Using the `Array.prototype.slice()` method instead of spread syntax. * Using the `Array.prototype.concat()` method with an empty array as its first argument. * Implementing a custom loop-based approach to create a new array from the original one. Keep in mind that each alternative would introduce different pros and cons, depending on the specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
string-interpolation-vs-to-stirng
string-interpolation-vs-toString
string-interpolation-vs-toString-vs-plus-string
string-interpolation-vs-to-string
JSON.parse vs string.splitn
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?