Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Name Generator 2 NC
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
generateStr vs generateArr
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function generateArr(names) { var combinedArr = []; names.map((owner, index) => { var tempArr = [ [], [], [], [],[], [],[], [],[], [],[], [],[], [],[], [],[], [],[], [] ]; tempArr[index].push(owner.firstName); tempArr[index].push(owner.lastName); tempArr[index].join(','); combinedArr.push(tempArr[index].join(' ').trim()); }); return combinedArr.join(', '); } function generateStr(names) { var str = ''; names.map((owner, index) => { if (index > 0) { str += ', '; } str += owner['firstName'].trim() + ' '; str += owner['lastName'].trim(); str.trim(); }); return str; }
Tests:
generateStr
generateStr([{ firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' } ]);
generateArr
generateArr([{ firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' }, { firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Doe' }, { firstName: 'Courtney', lastName: '' } ]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
generateStr
generateArr
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark definition is a JavaScript function that generates a string from an array of objects containing `firstName` and `lastName` properties. There are two different implementations: 1. `generateStr(names)`: This function iterates over the array, concatenating the first name and last name of each object with commas in between. 2. `generateArr(names)`: This function creates a 2D array where each row contains the first name and last name of an object, then joins them into strings. **Options Compared:** The two options being compared are: 1. `generateStr(names)`: This implementation is likely to be faster because it uses string concatenation, which is optimized in modern JavaScript engines. 2. `generateArr(names)`: This implementation creates a 2D array and then joins the rows into strings, which may incur additional overhead. **Pros and Cons:** * `generateStr(names)`: + Pros: Likely to be faster due to string concatenation optimization. + Cons: May require more memory allocations for the temporary array. * `generateArr(names)`: + Pros: May be easier to maintain or extend, as it uses a 2D array structure. + Cons: May incur additional overhead due to array creation and joining. **Library/Functionality:** There is no explicit library or functionality being used in this benchmark. However, the use of `join()` and `trim()` methods suggests that modern JavaScript engines are optimized for these operations. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being used in this benchmark that would require additional explanation. **Other Alternatives:** If you want to explore alternative implementations, here are some possibilities: 1. Use `Array.prototype.map()` and template literals instead of string concatenation. 2. Use a library like Lodash to implement the `generateArr(names)` function. 3. Use a different data structure, such as an array of strings or a JSON object, to represent the input data. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not necessarily improve performance or maintainability, and should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Related benchmarks:
Push vs Map
Push vs Map - repeats
For vs Map 2
2 Map vs Push
reduce vs Map arrays
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?