Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
validate undefined 3
(version: 2)
Comparing performance of:
data.parentNode vs data.parentNode !== undefined vs data.parentNode != undefined
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var data = { parentNode: true }
Tests:
data.parentNode
if (data.parentNode) { data.parentNode = true; }
data.parentNode !== undefined
if (data.parentNode !== undefined) { data.parentNode = true; }
data.parentNode != undefined
if (data.parentNode != undefined) { data.parentNode = true; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
data.parentNode
data.parentNode !== undefined
data.parentNode != undefined
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of JavaScript code that checks for the existence or value of the `parentNode` property of an object. The benchmark consists of three test cases: 1. `data.parentNode` 2. `data.parentNode !== undefined` 3. `data.parentNode != undefined` These test cases are designed to check if the browser is able to optimize and execute JavaScript code quickly when checking for the existence or value of a property. **Options Compared** The options being compared in this benchmark are: * Using the triple equals (`===`) operator for equality checks (`data.parentNode === true`) * Using the double equals (`==`) operator for equality checks (`data.parentNode == true`) * Using the not equal to (`!=`) operator for inequality checks (`data.parentNode != undefined`) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Triple Equals (`===`) Operator**: This is the most modern and safe way to compare values in JavaScript. It checks both the value and type equality, which can prevent issues with type coercion. * Pros: Safe, explicit, and efficient. * Cons: May be slower than other approaches due to its additional type checking. 2. **Double Equals (`==`) Operator**: This operator performs type coercion, which means it tries to convert both operands to a common type before comparing them. * Pros: Fast, but may introduce type coercion issues if not used carefully. * Cons: Less safe and less explicit than triple equals. 3. **Not Equal To (`!=`) Operator**: This operator is similar to the double equals operator but checks for inequality instead of equality. * Pros: Faster than using `==` due to its simpler operation. * Cons: May still perform type coercion if not used carefully. **Library and Special JavaScript Feature** There are no libraries or special JavaScript features being tested in this benchmark. The code is simple and standard JavaScript. **Considerations** When writing JavaScript code, it's essential to consider the potential pitfalls of each operator: * Using `===` for equality checks can prevent type coercion issues. * Using `==` or `!=` may introduce type coercion issues if not used carefully. * Always use consistent operators (either `===`, `==`, or `!=`) in a given codebase. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to measure JavaScript performance include: * Checking for property existence using the `in` operator (`data.parentNode in data`) * Using a library like Benchmark.js, which provides more features and flexibility than MeasureThat.net * Creating custom microbenchmarks using a different programming language or toolchain.
Related benchmarks:
Check if obj.prop is undefined
test delete
Delete undefined property
type coercion
type coercion null
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?