Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
getElementById vs querySelector custom
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
getelementById vs querySelector
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="cell"> <div class="grid-x grid-padding-x"> <div id="size-configuration-table" class="cell small-24 large-6"> <table class="vertical-table"> <thead> <tr> <th class="table-title h6" colspan="2"> Size Configuration </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <th> Id </th> <td> 98 </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Categories </th> <td> <ul class="no-bullet"> <li> <a href="/earth/categories/530">Ανδρικά Παντελόνια</a> </li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Manufacturers </th> <td> <ul class="no-bullet"> <li> <a href="/earth/manufacturers/1282">Lacoste</a> </li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Gender </th> <td> <ul class="no-bullet"> <li> Men </li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Numeric system </th> <td> Manufacturer </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Target system </th> <td> International (S,M,L) </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Status </th> <td> <span class="label warning"> Draft </span> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div id="size-chart" class="cell small-24 large-18"> <table class="vertical-table"> <thead> <tr> <th class="table-title h6" colspan="14"> Size Chart </th> </tr> <tr> <th id="lala" class="text-center system"> System </th> <th colspan="13" class="text-center sizes"> Sizes </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td> <b> IS </b> </td> <td> XS </td> <td> S </td> <td> S </td> <td> S </td> <td> M </td> <td> M </td> <td> L </td> <td> L </td> <td> XL </td> <td> XL </td> <td> XXL </td> <td> XXL </td> <td> XXXL </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b> MNF </b> </td> <td> 34 </td> <td> 36 </td> <td> 36 </td> <td> 38 </td> <td> 40 </td> <td> 42 </td> <td> 44 </td> <td> 46 </td> <td> 48 </td> <td> 50 </td> <td> 52 </td> <td> 54 </td> <td> 56 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b> WL </b> </td> <td> 28 </td> <td> 28 </td> <td> 29 </td> <td> 30 </td> <td> 32 </td> <td> 33 </td> <td> 34 </td> <td> 36 </td> <td> 38 </td> <td> 40 </td> <td> 42 </td> <td> 44 </td> <td> 46 </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div>
Script Preparation code:
var parentElement = document.getElementById('size-chart');
Tests:
getelementById
document.getElementById('lala')
querySelector
parentElement.querySelector('#lala');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
getelementById
querySelector
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between `getElementById` and `querySelector` methods in JavaScript, specifically when used to select an element by its id. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **getelementById**: This test case uses the `document.getElementById('lala')` method to retrieve an element from the DOM. 2. **querySelector**: This test case uses the `parentElement.querySelector('#lala')` method to retrieve an element from the DOM, where `parentElement` is a previously retrieved element. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **getElementById**: A traditional method for retrieving an element by its id. 2. **querySelector**: A more modern method for retrieving elements by their selectors, which can also be used to retrieve elements by their ids. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **getElementById**: + Pros: Simple and widely supported, no additional library or configuration required. + Cons: Can be slower than `querySelector` due to the need to search the entire DOM tree. * **querySelector**: + Pros: More powerful and flexible, can also be used for other types of selections (e.g., classes, attributes). + Cons: Requires a previously retrieved element (`parentElement`) or a more complex CSS selector. **Library Used** The `querySelector` method uses the W3C Selectors API, which is a standardized way of selecting elements in HTML and XML documents. The `querySelector` method is part of the DOM4 specification. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show that: * **querySelector** outperforms **getElementById** by approximately 10% in terms of executions per second. * The performance difference between the two methods is relatively small, suggesting that both methods are efficient and well-optimized. Overall, this benchmark highlights the trade-offs between traditional `getElementById` and more modern `querySelector` methods for retrieving elements from the DOM. While `querySelector` offers greater flexibility and power, it also requires a previously retrieved element or a more complex CSS selector, which can add complexity to the code.
Related benchmarks:
Get elements by class: jQuery vs querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName (jQuery 1.x)
Get elements by class: jQuery vs querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName
Get elements by class: jQuery vs querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName
Get elements by class: jQuery vs querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName 👻
Get elements by class: jQuery vs querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName (Jquery 3.3.1)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?