Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
querySelector vs getElementById inside parent
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
QuerySelector vs getelementById
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="cell"> <div class="grid-x grid-padding-x"> <div id="size-configuration-table" class="cell small-24 large-6"> <table class="vertical-table"> <thead> <tr> <th class="table-title h6" colspan="2"> Size Configuration </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <th> Id </th> <td> 98 </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Categories </th> <td> <ul class="no-bullet"> <li> <a href="/earth/categories/530">Ανδρικά Παντελόνια</a> </li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Manufacturers </th> <td> <ul class="no-bullet"> <li> <a href="/earth/manufacturers/1282">Lacoste</a> </li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Gender </th> <td> <ul class="no-bullet"> <li> Men </li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Numeric system </th> <td> Manufacturer </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Target system </th> <td> International (S,M,L) </td> </tr> <tr> <th> Status </th> <td> <span class="label warning"> Draft </span> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div id="size-chart" class="cell small-24 large-18"> <table class="vertical-table"> <thead> <tr> <th class="table-title h6" colspan="14"> Size Chart </th> </tr> <tr> <th id="lala" class="text-center system"> System </th> <th colspan="13" class="text-center sizes"> Sizes </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td> <b> IS </b> </td> <td> XS </td> <td> S </td> <td> S </td> <td> S </td> <td> M </td> <td> M </td> <td> L </td> <td> L </td> <td> XL </td> <td> XL </td> <td> XXL </td> <td> XXL </td> <td> XXXL </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b> MNF </b> </td> <td> 34 </td> <td> 36 </td> <td> 36 </td> <td> 38 </td> <td> 40 </td> <td> 42 </td> <td> 44 </td> <td> 46 </td> <td> 48 </td> <td> 50 </td> <td> 52 </td> <td> 54 </td> <td> 56 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b> WL </b> </td> <td> 28 </td> <td> 28 </td> <td> 29 </td> <td> 30 </td> <td> 32 </td> <td> 33 </td> <td> 34 </td> <td> 36 </td> <td> 38 </td> <td> 40 </td> <td> 42 </td> <td> 44 </td> <td> 46 </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> </div> </div>
Script Preparation code:
const parentElement = document.getElementById('size-chart');
Tests:
QuerySelector
parentElement.querySelector('#lala');
getelementById
document.getElementById('lala')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
QuerySelector
getelementById
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: 1. `querySelector` (querying by ID using the query selector API) 2. `getElementById` (getting an element by its ID directly) **Script Preparation Code** The script prepares a HTML document with a table structure: ```javascript const parentElement = document.getElementById('size-chart'); ``` This sets up the DOM and makes it accessible to both query methods. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML code is embedded in the benchmark definition, which creates a table structure with an element having ID `#lala` inside another element with ID `size-chart`. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **QuerySelector**: The script uses `querySelector` to select the element with ID `#lala`. 2. **getelementById**: The script directly uses `getElementById` to get the element with ID `#lala`. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two query methods: * **`querySelector`**: Uses the query selector API to find an element by its CSS selector (in this case, `#lala`). This method is more flexible and can be used for multiple purposes. * **`getElementById`**: Directly gets an element by its ID. This method is simple but less flexible than `querySelector`. **Pros and Cons** **QuerySelector:** Pros: * More flexible and versatile * Can be used for multiple purposes (not just getting elements) * Less DOM manipulation required Cons: * Might be slower due to the overhead of parsing CSS selectors * Requires support for the query selector API, which might not be available in older browsers **getelementById:** Pros: * Fast and simple * Doesn't require additional libraries or APIs * Works well for getting a single element by its ID Cons: * Less flexible and less versatile than `querySelector` * Can be slower due to the overhead of parsing IDs **Benchmark Result** The latest benchmark result shows that: * `getelementById` outperforms `QuerySelector` with an execution rate of 3401422.5 executions per second. * `QuerySelector` has a much lower execution rate (0 executions per second), indicating it is slower. Overall, the benchmark suggests that `getelementById` is faster than `QuerySelector` for this specific use case. However, the performance difference might vary depending on the context and requirements of your application.
Related benchmarks:
parent vs document queryselectorAll
getElementById vs QuerySelector nested element
EventListener in parent vs EventListener in childs
Array.from vs spread for DOM
Node parent walking vs node contains
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?