Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object to Arrayss
(version: 0)
Converts object to array.
Comparing performance of:
Current Method vs My Method (removed empty check) vs Yashish Method
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function obj2Array2(obj, prefix) { var arr = []; _.forIn(obj, function (value, key) { if (_.isObject(value) && !_.isEmpty(value)) { arr = _.concat(arr, obj2Array2(value, key)); } else { arr.push(key); try { arr.push(JSON.stringify(value)); } catch (e) { arr.push(value); } } }); if (_.isString(prefix) && !_.isEmpty(prefix)) { return _.map(arr, function (arg, index) { if (index % 2 === 0) { return `${prefix}.${arg}`; } return arg; }); } return arr; } function obj2Array (object, prefix) { var arr = []; Object.keys(object).forEach(function (key) { const value = object[key]; if (typeof value === 'object') { let prefixedKey = (prefix && `${prefix}.${key}`) || key, returnedArray = obj2Array(value, prefixedKey); arr = arr.concat(returnedArray); return; } arr.push((prefix && `${prefix}.${key}`) || key); arr.push(JSON.stringify(value)); }); return arr; } function obj2Array3(obj, prefix, arr = []) { if (!obj) { return arr; } const usePrefix = prefix && typeof prefix === 'string'; usePrefix && (prefix += '.'); Object.keys(obj).forEach(function (key) { const value = obj[key]; usePrefix && (key = prefix + key); if (typeof value === 'object') { obj2Array3(value, key, arr); } else { arr.push(key, JSON.stringify(value)); } }); return arr; } var objToTest = { user: { id: 123, data: { username: 'marvin', email: 'marvin@heartofgold.ship' }, tags: ['robot', 'depressed', 'brain the size of a planet'] } }
Tests:
Current Method
obj2Array2(objToTest);
My Method (removed empty check)
obj2Array(objToTest);
Yashish Method
obj2Array3(objToTest);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Current Method
My Method (removed empty check)
Yashish Method
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll take a deep breath and dive into explaining the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript function that converts an object to an array. The three functions are: 1. `obj2Array2(obj, prefix)`: This function uses the Lodash library (`_`) for iteration and string manipulation. 2. `obj2Array(object, prefix)`: This function iterates over the object's keys and pushes values to the array if they are objects themselves. 3. `obj2Array3(obj, prefix, arr = [])`: This function iterates over the object's keys and pushes values to the array. It also adds a prefix to key names. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares three different approaches: 1. **`Current Method` (obj2Array2)**: Uses Lodash library for iteration and string manipulation. * Pros: + Efficient use of Lodash's iteration functions (`_.forIn`). + Handles nested objects recursively. * Cons: + Requires the Lodash library, which might be an additional dependency. 2. **`My Method (removed empty check)`**: Similar to `obj2Array`, but without the empty check. * Pros: None mentioned in the benchmark results. * Cons: Removed empty check means it will handle empty objects differently than the other two methods. 3. **`Yashish Method (obj2Array3)`**: A simple iterative approach with prefixing key names. * Pros: + Easy to understand and implement. + No external libraries required. **Pros and Cons** Each method has its strengths and weaknesses: 1. `obj2Array2`: * Pros: Efficient iteration, handles nested objects, uses Lodash library. * Cons: Requires additional dependency (Lodash). 2. `My Method (removed empty check)`: * Pros: None mentioned. * Cons: Removed empty check might change behavior for empty objects. 3. `Yashish Method`: * Pros: Easy to understand and implement, no external libraries required. * Cons: Might not be as efficient or handle nested objects recursively. **Library** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for iteration, array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash's `forIn` function is used to iterate over the object's keys. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you want to implement an alternative conversion method without using any libraries (like Lodash), you could use a simple iterative approach similar to `Yashish Method` but with more robust error handling and possibly recursion. Another option would be to use built-in JavaScript methods like `Object.keys()` or `Array.prototype.forEach()` for iteration. Keep in mind that this benchmark is focused on comparing three specific implementation approaches, so exploring alternative libraries or implementations might not provide a direct comparison to the results obtained here.
Related benchmarks:
conact vs push
Array updating for angular
Testing Spread 21062023
Array.from vs array destructure
For in vs Object.*.forEach vs Object.values 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?