Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
sdasdas
(version: 0)
sadsada
Comparing performance of:
adasdad vs sdasdasd
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
adasdad
var timer = setTimeout(function() { }, 10); clearTimeout(timer);
sdasdasd
var timer = setTimeout(function() { }, 10); clearTimeout(timer);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
adasdad
sdasdasd
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the explanation into smaller sections for easier understanding. **Benchmark Definition and Structure** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark definition, which consists of: * `Name` and `Description`: arbitrary strings that can be used to identify and describe the benchmark. * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: optional code snippets that are executed before running the benchmark. In this case, both fields are null, indicating that no preparation code is required. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark definition includes an array of individual test cases, each represented as a JSON object containing: * `Benchmark Definition`: a JavaScript expression or function that defines the benchmark. In these examples, it's a `setTimeout` call with a timer set to 10ms. * `Test Name`: a unique string identifier for the test case. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, two options are compared: 1. Clearing the timeout timer using `clearTimeout(timer)`. 2. Not clearing the timeout timer (i.e., allowing it to expire naturally). The pros and cons of these approaches are: * **Clearing the timeout timer**: This approach ensures that the benchmark is not dependent on the timer expiring naturally, which can introduce variability in the results. However, it may also waste system resources by creating a new timeout. * **Not clearing the timeout timer**: This approach allows the timer to expire naturally, which can provide more accurate results but introduces variability due to external factors like system load or other processes competing for resources. **Library Usage** There is no library usage in these benchmark definitions. However, if there were libraries involved, it would likely impact the benchmark's behavior and accuracy. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. The focus is on comparing the performance of clearing a timeout timer versus not doing so. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to create alternative benchmarks using different options, some ideas could be: * Comparing the performance of clearing multiple timers vs. a single timer. * Using `setInterval` instead of `setTimeout`. * Including external dependencies or libraries in the benchmark to test their performance impact. * Using a different programming language or paradigm (e.g., Python, Java) for comparison. Keep in mind that when creating alternative benchmarks, it's essential to ensure that they are well-defined, measurable, and relevant to your specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
Array like to array convertion
lodash startsWith vs native startsWith
lodash some vs native array some
lodash size vs native Object.keys length vs JSON string
lodash.uniq vs native Set (multi array)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?