Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Splice vs pop 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Pop vs Splice
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Pop
var abc = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]; abc.pop(); abc.pop();
Splice
var abc = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]; abc.splice(abc.length - 2);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Pop
Splice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two different approaches: using `pop()` versus `splice()`. Both methods are used to remove elements from an array in JavaScript. The test case creates an array `abc` with 10 elements, and then either removes the last two elements using `pop()` (twice) or uses `splice()` to remove the last two elements. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of: 1. **Pop**: Using `pop()` twice to remove the last two elements from the array. 2. **Splice**: Using `splice()` with an offset of `abc.length - 2` to remove the last two elements from the array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** ### Pop * Pros: + Simple and concise implementation + No need to manually manage index calculations * Cons: + Requires multiple function calls, which can lead to increased overhead due to function call costs + May not be as efficient as other methods if the array is large or densely populated ### Splice * Pros: + More flexible and powerful than `pop()`, allowing for more complex removal scenarios + Can reduce memory allocation and garbage collection overhead * Cons: + Requires manual index calculation, which can lead to performance issues if not done correctly + May be slower than `pop()` due to the overhead of parsing the offset value **Library Used** In this benchmark, no external libraries are used. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard array methods. However, it's worth noting that modern browsers have various performance-related optimizations and caching mechanisms in place for array methods like `pop()` and `splice()`, which can affect their performance. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches to removing elements from an array include: 1. **Shift()**: Similar to `pop()`, but shifts the remaining elements instead of removing them. 2. **Slice()**: Creates a new array with a subset of the original array's elements, allowing for more flexible removal scenarios. 3. **Array.prototype.slice.call(array).splice(index, length)`: This approach creates a new array and then uses `splice()` to modify it. These alternatives may offer different performance profiles depending on the specific use case and implementation details.
Related benchmarks:
Slice vs splice forked
Slice vs splice 2 ...
pop() and push() vs. splice()
splice vs double pop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?