Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jquery level selector
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
children .level1 vs children div.level1 vs find .level1 vs find div.level1
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="test"> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> <div class="level1"><div class="level2"></div></div> </div>
Tests:
children .level1
$('#test').children('.level1');
children div.level1
$('#test').children('div.level1');
find .level1
$('#test').find('.level1');
find div.level1
$('#test').find('div.level1');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
children .level1
children div.level1
find .level1
find div.level1
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark measures the performance of different selectors in jQuery, specifically `children` and `find`. The benchmark consists of four test cases: 1. `children .level1` 2. `children div.level1` 3. `find .level1` 4. `find div.level1` Each test case uses a similar HTML structure with multiple nested elements. **Options Compared** The options compared in this benchmark are: * `children`: selects all child elements of the specified element. * `children .class`: selects all child elements that match the specified class (in this case, `.level1`). * `find`: selects the first element that matches the specified selector. * `find .class`: selects the first element that matches the specified class (in this case, `.level1`). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each approach: * **`children`**: This method is generally faster because it avoids the overhead of parsing CSS selectors. However, it can be less efficient if the element has many child elements that don't match the specified class. * `children .class`: This method is slower than `children` because it requires additional processing to parse the class selector. However, it's more efficient than `find` for large datasets. * **`find`**: This method is generally slower than both `children` and `children .class` because it requires more overhead to parse the CSS selector. However, it's a safer choice if you're not sure what elements to match, as it stops at the first match. * `find .class`: Similar to `children .class`, this method is slower than `children` but faster than `find`. It's a good balance between performance and safety. **Library Used** In this benchmark, jQuery is used as the library. jQuery provides an efficient way to select elements on the DOM, and its selector engine is optimized for performance. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the provided test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would affect their performance significantly. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may have different optimizations or quirks when executing these selectors. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to write a benchmark like this using a framework other than jQuery, you could consider using: * DOM manipulation libraries like React or Angular * CSS-in-JS solutions like Styled Components or Emotion * Frameworks that provide built-in selector engines, such as Vue.js or Preact Keep in mind that the performance characteristics of these alternatives may vary depending on the specific use case and browser support.
Related benchmarks:
jquery level selector
jquery level selector
jquery level selector
jquery level selector
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?