Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
slice vs splice for inserting object 1000
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
slice vs splice
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var events = []; var virtualEventIndex = 400 var virtualEvent = { key: 'virtual' } for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { events.push({ key: i }); }
Tests:
slice
var newEvents = [ ...events.slice(0, virtualEventIndex), virtualEvent, ...events.slice(virtualEventIndex), ]
splice
events.splice(virtualEventIndex, 0, virtualEvent)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
slice
splice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark compares two approaches for inserting an object into an array: using `slice` and using `splice`. The test case consists of creating an array of 1000 objects, removing a specific object from the middle (at index 400), and then re-inserting that object at the same position. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **Using `slice`**: Specifically, the code uses `events.slice(0, virtualEventIndex)` to get the first part of the array up to the removed object's original index, `virtualEvent` to insert, and then `events.slice(virtualEventIndex)` to get the second part of the array from the removed object's new index. This creates a new array with the object inserted. 2. **Using `splice`**: The code uses `events.splice(virtualEventIndex, 0, virtualEvent)` to directly insert the object at the specified position. **Pros and Cons** * **Using `slice`**: + Pros: Creates a shallow copy of the original array, which can be beneficial if you need to preserve the original array's state. The resulting array is also more predictable, as it doesn't modify the original array. + Cons: Creates two new arrays (one for the first part and one for the second part), which can be memory-intensive. * **Using `splice`**: + Pros: Modifies the original array in place, reducing memory usage. It's also generally faster than creating multiple arrays. + Cons: The original array is modified, which can have unexpected consequences if you need to preserve its state. **Library and Syntax** There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in the benchmark code. However, `slice` and `splice` are built-in JavaScript methods that operate on arrays. No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following factors: * **Memory usage**: If memory efficiency is crucial, using `splice` might be a better choice. * **Predictability and stability**: If you need to ensure that the resulting array doesn't modify the original array's state, using `slice` might be more suitable. * **Performance**: Using `splice` can generally be faster than creating multiple arrays with `slice`. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to inserting objects into an array, consider: * Using a library like `lodash` or `ramda`, which provide optimized and tested implementations of array operations. * Using a different data structure, such as a linked list or a queue, if the above options don't meet your requirements. Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preferences.
Related benchmarks:
Slice & Splice vs ES6 Array Spread
Slice vs Splice delete
Slice vs Splice delete 1000
Slice vs splice first three elements
Slice vs Splice vs Shift (Large Array)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?