Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash min vs Math.min findinex1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_.min vs Math.min vs findIndex
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.7.11/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max)); } var arr = []; var min = 8; for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){ arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)}); }
Tests:
_.min
_.min(arr);
Math.min
Math.min(...arr)
findIndex
arr.findIndex((v) => v < min)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.min
Math.min
findIndex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, specifically designed to compare the performance of different approaches for finding the minimum value in an array. The test utilizes the `Lodash` library and measures the execution speed of three variants: 1. Using Lodash's `min` function 2. Using the built-in `Math.min` function 3. Using a custom implementation with `findIndex` **Options Compared** The benchmark compares three options: ### 1. Lodash's `min` Function Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for common tasks, including array manipulation. The `min` function returns the smallest element in an array. Pros: * Well-documented and widely used * Efficient implementation optimized for performance Cons: * Adds external dependency (Lodash) * May introduce additional overhead due to library loading ### 2. Built-in `Math.min` Function The built-in `Math.min` function returns the smallest of zero or more numbers. Pros: * No external dependencies required * Low overhead and fast execution Cons: * May not be as efficient as optimized implementations * Requires care when handling edge cases (e.g., empty arrays) ### 3. Custom Implementation with `findIndex` The custom implementation uses the `findIndex` function to find the index of the smallest element in the array, then returns that index. Pros: * No external dependencies required * Can be optimized for performance Cons: * May require additional logic and handling for edge cases * Less readable and maintainable compared to Lodash's implementation **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides various functions for common tasks, including array manipulation. The `min` function is part of the Lodash API. Pros: * Well-documented and widely used * Efficient implementation optimized for performance Cons: * Adds external dependency (Lodash) * May introduce additional overhead due to library loading **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses a special JavaScript feature called an " Immediately Invoked Function Expression" (IIFE) in the `getRandomInt` function. This syntax is used to create a function that is executed immediately after its definition. Pros: * Allows for concise and readable code * Enables the use of JavaScript features like closures Cons: * May be unfamiliar to developers without experience with IIFEs or advanced JavaScript concepts **Other Alternatives** Alternative approaches to find the minimum value in an array include: 1. Using `reduce`: A more functional programming approach that iterates over the array and applies a reduction function to each element. 2. Using `every` and `some`: By using these functions with callback functions, you can create a custom implementation for finding the minimum value. 3. Using `forEach`: You could use `forEach` with a callback function to iterate over the array and find the minimum value. However, these alternatives are not directly compared in this benchmarking test case.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash max vs Math.max (lodash 4.7.11)
Lodash min vs Math.min (lodash 4.7.11)
Labels
Lodash vs Math (lodash 4.17.5) arr(5000)
Lodash.isArray vs Array.isArray (Lodash v4.17.15)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?