Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
index vs lastindexof empty with startIndex set to 0
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lastIndexOf vs indexOf
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
lastIndexOf
var str = "According to that, indexOf is just a little bit faster. Of course, it does depend on what you are indexing.IndexOf looks for the first occurrence and lastIndexOf returns to the last occurrence. That all said, their are much better functions around now like map.To be honest though, if Google is using it there is probably a good reason."; var n = str.lastIndexOf("havent string", 0);
indexOf
var str = "According to that, indexOf is just a little bit faster. Of course, it does depend on what you are indexing.IndexOf looks for the first occurrence and lastIndexOf returns to the last occurrence. That all said, their are much better functions around now like map.To be honest though, if Google is using it there is probably a good reason."; var n = str.indexOf("havent string", 0);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lastIndexOf
indexOf
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript string methods: `indexOf()` and `lastIndexOf()`. **What's being tested?** The benchmark measures how many times each method can successfully find a specific substring within a larger string in a given amount of time. The substring is "havent string", and both tests use `startIndex` set to 0. * **`indexOf()`:** This method returns the *first* occurrence of the substring within the string, starting from the specified index (in this case, 0). * **`lastIndexOf()`:** This method returns the *last* occurrence of the substring within the string, starting from the specified index (again, 0 in this case). **Options Compared:** The benchmark directly compares `indexOf()` and `lastIndexOf()`. It doesn't offer alternative libraries or approaches because it focuses on built-in JavaScript functionality. **Pros and Cons:** * **`indexOf()`:** * **Pro:** Generally faster than `lastIndexOf()` when searching for the first occurrence of a substring. * **Con:** Returns -1 if the substring is not found, which can require additional checks in your code. * **`lastIndexOf()`:** * **Pro:** Useful when you need to find the last occurrence of a substring, especially towards the end of the string. * **Con:** Typically slower than `indexOf()` because it needs to scan the entire string backward. **Alternatives:** While not explored in this benchmark, alternative methods for finding substrings include: * **Regular Expressions (`RegExp`):** Offer more complex pattern matching capabilities but can be slower than built-in string methods for simple searches. * **Third-party Libraries:** Some libraries, like Lodash or Underscore.js, provide optimized string manipulation functions that might offer performance improvements in certain scenarios. **Key Considerations:** * **String Length:** `lastIndexOf()`'s performance degrades more noticeably with longer strings because it needs to traverse the entire string backward. * **Use Case:** Choose `indexOf()` for finding the first occurrence and `lastIndexOf()` for the last occurrence. Let me know if you have any other questions!
Related benchmarks:
index vs lastindexof startsWith
index vs lastindexof empty
index vs lastindexofasdf
index vs lastindexof (last index)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?