Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
concat and push
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
concat vs push
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src=''></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr1 = Array.from(Array(50000), (x,i) => i + 1) var arr2 = Array.from(Array(50000), (x,i) => i - 1)
Tests:
concat
arr1.concat(arr2)
push
arr1.push(...arr2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
concat
push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of two different approaches for concatenating or pushing arrays in JavaScript: `concat()` and `push()`. The test cases are created using a JSON file that defines the script preparation code, HTML preparation code, and individual test cases. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code generates two large arrays (`arr1` and `arr2`) with 50,000 elements each. The arrays are populated with incremental and decremental values, respectively. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **concat**: This test case measures the performance of concatenating `arr1` and `arr2` using the `concat()` method. 2. **push**: This test case measures the performance of pushing all elements from `arr2` into `arr1` using the `push()` method with the spread operator (`...`). **Library** None of the provided code uses any external libraries. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code only uses standard JavaScript methods and operators. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: 1. **concat()**: This method concatenates the two arrays and returns a new array with all elements. 2. **push()**: This method pushes all elements from `arr2` into `arr1`, modifying `arr1` in place. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **concat():** Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * Returns a new array, which can be useful if you want to preserve the original arrays Cons: * Creates a new array with all elements, which can lead to increased memory usage * May not be as efficient as `push()` for large datasets **push():** Pros: * Modifies the original array in place, reducing memory allocation and deallocation overhead * Can be more efficient than `concat()` for large datasets Cons: * More complex to understand and implement, especially when dealing with large datasets * May not preserve the original arrays if you need to reuse them **Other Considerations** When choosing between `concat()` and `push()`, consider the following factors: * Memory usage: If memory allocation and deallocation are expensive or limited, `push()` might be a better choice. * Array preservation: If you need to preserve the original arrays or reuse them, `concat()` might be a better choice. * Performance: For large datasets, `push()` is likely to perform better due to reduced memory overhead. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches, consider: 1. **Array.prototype.reduce()**: This method can concatenate or merge arrays in a more efficient way than `concat()` or `push()`. 2. **Array.prototype spread operator (`...`)**: While not as widely supported as `push()`, this operator can be used to push elements into an array. 3. **Native Web Workers**: If you're dealing with extremely large datasets, using native Web Workers can provide a more efficient solution. Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Copy Array
Array Concat Test
concat and push1
copy an array 3232
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?