Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
rcss split vs regex
(version: 3)
Comparing performance of:
split + regex vs regex
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
split + regex
const eventSelectorRegex = /\[(#|\.)[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+\]/; let item = '@mousemove.clientX[.sidenav]'; let arr = item.substr(1).split('.'); let eventName = arr[0]; let eventPropName = arr[1];
regex
const regex = /@([a-zA-Z0-9_]+\b)(?:\[((?:#|\.)[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+)\]|)\.([a-zA-Z0-9_]+\b)/; let item = '@mousemove.clientX[.sidenav]'; let res = item.match(regex); let eventName = res[1]; let eventPropName = res[2]; let selector = res[3];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split + regex
regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark test case. **Benchmark Test Case:** The test case compares two approaches for parsing an event selector string: 1. **Split + Regex**: This approach uses JavaScript's `split()` method to split the event selector string into parts, followed by a regular expression (regex) to extract the required information. 2. **Regex-only**: This approach uses a single regex pattern to match and extract the required information from the event selector string. **Library/Feature Used:** None are used in this test case. **Explanation:** The test case is designed to measure the performance of parsing an event selector string, which is commonly used in web development. The string format is `@eventName[selector]`, where `eventName` is the name of the event (e.g., "mousemove"), and `[selector]` is a CSS selector (e.g., ".sidenav"). In the **Split + Regex** approach: * The `split()` method splits the event selector string at the first character (`@`) to separate the event name from the rest of the string. * A regex pattern `/\\[(#|\\.)[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+\\]/` is used to extract the CSS selector from the remaining string. In the **Regex-only** approach: * A single regex pattern `/@([a-zA-Z0-9_]+\\b)(?:\\[((?:#|\\.)[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+)\\]|)\\.([a-zA-Z0-9_]+\\b)/` is used to match and extract the event name, CSS selector, and any other information from the event selector string. **Pros/Cons:** The **Split + Regex** approach may be more readable and maintainable for developers familiar with JavaScript's `split()` method. However, it requires two separate operations (splitting and regex matching), which might incur additional overhead. The **Regex-only** approach is a single operation that can match and extract the required information in one step. However, regex patterns can be complex to write and debug, especially for those without prior experience. **Other Alternatives:** Other alternatives could include: * Using a dedicated event selector parsing library (e.g., `event-sel`). * Implementing a custom parser using a more efficient algorithm (e.g., using a trie data structure). * Using a different approach altogether (e.g., using a string manipulation library like `string-slice`). Note that these alternatives are not tested in this specific benchmark, but they might be relevant depending on the use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
str.match vs str.Split(regex)
Very simple regex vs string split
str.match vs str.Split3322
str.match vs str.Split in regex
JavaScript string split vs match using regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?