Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array loop vs hasownproperty
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array vs Object
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var object = {}; var array = []; function randomIntFromInterval(min, max) { // min and max included return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1) + min); } for(let i = 0; i < 5000; i++){ object['id'+i] = true; array.push(['id'+i, true]); }
Tests:
Array
let lookupId = randomIntFromInterval(0, 5000); for(let i = 0; i < array.length; i++){ if(array[i][0] == 'id'+lookupId){ return array[i][1]; } }
Object
let lookupId = randomIntFromInterval(0, 5000); let lookupString = 'id'+lookupId; if(object.hasOwnProperty(lookupString)){ return object[lookupString]; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array
Object
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the details of this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares two different approaches to look up an element in an array or an object by its key. **Approach 1: Array lookup (Test Name: "Array")** In this approach, a random index `lookupId` is generated between 0 and the length of the array. Then, a loop iterates over the array elements, checking if the first element of each pair (`array[i][0]`) matches the string `'id'+lookupId`. If it does, the second element of that pair (`array[i][1]`) is returned. **Approach 2: Object lookup (Test Name: "Object")** In this approach, a random key `lookupString` is generated as `'id'+lookupId`. Then, the `hasOwnProperty()` method is called on the object to check if it has a property with that name. If it does, the value of that property (`object[lookupString]`) is returned. **What are the pros and cons of each approach?** * **Array lookup:** + Pros: - Can take advantage of array indexing for fast lookups. - Simple implementation. + Cons: - Requires a loop to iterate over the entire array, which can be slow if the array is large. - Does not handle cases where the key is missing or invalid. * **Object lookup:** + Pros: - Can use object property access for fast lookups. - Handles cases where the key is missing or invalid (returns `undefined`). + Cons: - Requires a more complex implementation with `hasOwnProperty()` and property access. - May be slower than array lookup due to the overhead of object lookups. **Other considerations:** * The benchmark uses a random index `lookupId` to simulate real-world usage patterns. This helps ensure that the results are not biased towards any particular approach. * The test cases use a large number of iterations (5000) to stress-test both approaches and get accurate performance measurements. **Library used: None** There is no external library used in this benchmark. All code is written in plain JavaScript. **Special JS feature or syntax: None** No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark. **Alternatives:** Other alternatives for looking up an element by its key include: * Using a hash map (e.g., `Map` in modern JavaScript) to store the elements, which provides fast lookups. * Implementing a custom indexing scheme, such as using a balanced binary search tree or a heap, to improve lookup performance. However, these alternatives are not being compared in this specific benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Fill array with random integers
Array push vs
Array fill method vs for loop
at(-1) vs (length - 1)
Spread Operator VS Array.prototype.slice() VS Array.prototype.slice(0)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?