Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Javascript array test
(version: 0)
Javascript array test
Comparing performance of:
lodash vs native
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['2', '3', '4'];
Tests:
lodash
_.find(arr, '2');
native
arr.find(element => element === '2');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The website is testing two approaches to find a specific element in an array: 1. **Lodash**: The benchmark uses Lodash, a popular JavaScript utility library. In this case, the script preparation code includes a line importing Lodash and defining a variable `arr` containing the string array. The HTML preparation code links to the Lodash library. 2. **Native (JavaScript)**: The other test case uses the native JavaScript method for finding an element in an array. It defines a function that takes an array and checks if each element is equal to the target value `'2'`. **Pros and Cons** * **Lodash**: + Pros: Lodash provides a robust set of utility functions, including `find`, which can make code more concise and readable. + Cons: Using an external library adds overhead due to dependencies and potential version conflicts. * **Native (JavaScript)**: + Pros: This approach is lightweight and doesn't require any additional dependencies or versions. + Cons: The native method requires more boilerplate code and may not be as elegant as the Lodash solution. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the trade-offs: * If you need to perform similar operations frequently, using a library like Lodash can save time and improve maintainability. * However, if performance is critical or you're working on a small project with limited dependencies, the native JavaScript approach might be more suitable. **Device-Specific Considerations** The benchmark results show variations in execution speed between different devices (Desktop vs. ?). This could be due to: * Device-specific hardware configurations * Operating system differences * Browser versions These factors can affect performance, so it's essential to test on various devices and platforms when developing software. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative methods to find an element in an array, consider: * **Using `filter()`**: Instead of `find()`, you could use `filter()` to create a new array with elements that match the condition. This approach might be more efficient if you need to filter out multiple elements. * **Using `indexOf()` or `includes()`**: These methods can help find an element in an array, but they may not be as flexible as `find()`. Keep in mind that these alternatives have their own trade-offs and might not offer better performance in all cases.
Related benchmarks:
lodash slice
_.isEmpty vs. Array.length
Length vs Lodash Size
Array From vs lodash clone
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?