Benchmark: duration format - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

            var getFormattedDurationA = function(duration) {
                var formattedTime = [
                    ('0' + duration.minutes()).slice(-2),
                    ('0' + duration.seconds()).slice(-2)
                ];
                if (duration.hours() > 0) {
                    formattedTime.unshift(duration.hours());
                }
                return formattedTime.join(':');
            }

            var getFormattedDurationB = function(duration) {
                var formattedTime = [
                    (duration.minutes() > 9 ? '0' : '') + duration.minutes(),
                    (duration.seconds() > 9 ? '0' : '') + duration.seconds()
                ];
                if (duration.hours() > 0) {
                    formattedTime.unshift(duration.hours());
                }
                return formattedTime.join(':');
            }

            var getFormattedDurationC = function(duration) {
                return moment.utc(duration.asMilliseconds()).format((duration.hours() > 0 ? 'H:' : '') + 'mm:ss');
            }

Tests:

23:50
var duration1 = moment.duration(1000*60*60 * 23.5); getFormattedDurationA(duration1); getFormattedDurationB(duration1); getFormattedDurationC(duration1);
24:50
var duration2 = moment.duration(1000*60*60 * 24.5); getFormattedDurationA(duration2); getFormattedDurationB(duration2); getFormattedDurationC(duration2);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
23:50
24:50

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gemma2:9b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

This benchmark tests the performance of three different approaches for formatting durations into a HH:MM:SS string representation.  Let's break down each approach and its pros/cons:

**Approach A:**

* **Code Snippet:** The `getFormattedDurationA` function constructs the formatted string by manually manipulating individual minutes, seconds, and hours values. 
* **Pros:**  Potentially very efficient if you are only formatting durations in this specific way. It avoids unnecessary library dependencies.
* **Cons:** Can be more verbose and less readable compared to other approaches. Requires manual handling of edge cases (e.g., leading zeros).

**Approach B:**

* **Code Snippet:** The `getFormattedDurationB` function uses a similar logic to Approach A but incorporates ternary operators (`condition ? value1 : value2`) for adding leading zeros, making the code slightly more concise. 
* **Pros:** More concise than Approach A due to the use of ternary operators. Still avoids external libraries.
* **Cons:**  Similar to Approach A, it can become verbose if you need to handle many formatting variations.

**Approach C:**

* **Code Snippet:** The `getFormattedDurationC` function utilizes the Moment.js library (`moment.utc(duration.asMilliseconds()).format((duration.hours() > 0 ? 'H:' : '') + 'mm:ss')`).
* **Pros:** Highly concise and readable thanks to Moment.js's powerful formatting capabilities. Handles a wide range of date and time manipulations easily.
* **Cons:** Introduces a dependency on an external library (Moment.js).  Might add overhead if your project doesn't require other Time/Date functionalities provided by Moment.js.

**Alternatives:**

* **Native JavaScript Date/Time API:** You could explore using the native `Date` object and its methods for formatting durations. It might not be as feature-rich as Moment.js but can be a lightweight option if your needs are basic.

**Key Considerations:**

* **Performance:** While this benchmark focuses on formatting time strings, you should always consider the broader context of your application. A small performance difference in this one task might be negligible compared to other performance bottlenecks.
* **Readability and Maintainability:** Choose an approach that is clear, concise, and easy to understand for yourself and any other developers who will work on your code.

Related benchmarks:

duration format (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 23:50 vs 24:50

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

23:50

24:50

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gemma2:9b, generated one year ago):