Benchmark: duration format - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

            var getFormattedDurationA = function(duration) {
                var formattedTime = [
                    ('0' + duration.minutes()).slice(-2),
                    ('0' + duration.seconds()).slice(-2)
                ];
                if (duration.hours() > 0) {
                    formattedTime.unshift(duration.hours());
                }
                return formattedTime.join(':');
            }

            var getFormattedDurationB = function(duration) {
                var formattedTime = [
                    (duration.minutes() > 9 ? '0' : '') + duration.minutes(),
                    (duration.seconds() > 9 ? '0' : '') + duration.seconds()
                ];
                if (duration.hours() > 0) {
                    formattedTime.unshift(duration.hours());
                }
                return formattedTime.join(':');
            }

            var getFormattedDurationC = function(duration) {
                return moment.utc(duration.asMilliseconds()).format((duration.hours() > 0 ? 'H:' : '') + 'mm:ss');
            }

Tests:

23:50
var duration1 = moment.duration(1000*60*60 * 23.5); getFormattedDurationA(duration1); getFormattedDurationB(duration1); getFormattedDurationC(duration1);
24:50
var duration2 = moment.duration(1000*60*60 * 24.5); getFormattedDurationA(duration2); getFormattedDurationB(duration2); getFormattedDurationC(duration2);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
23:50
24:50

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark test case.

**What is being tested?**

The test case is measuring the duration it takes to format time durations in different ways using JavaScript. Specifically, it's testing three different approaches:

1. **Manual formatting**: This approach manually constructs a formatted string by concatenating hours, minutes, and seconds with colons (`:`) in between.
2. **Moment.js library**: This approach uses the popular Moment.js library to format time durations.
3. **Alternative manual formatting**: This is similar to the first approach but with slight variations in how it formats the hours, minutes, and seconds.

**Options being compared:**

The three approaches are:

1. **getFormattedDurationA**: Manual formatting using string concatenation.
2. **getFormattedDurationB**: Alternative manual formatting with some minor tweaks.
3. **getFormattedDurationC**: Using Moment.js to format time durations.

**Pros and cons of each approach:**

1. **Manual formatting (getFormattedDurationA)**:
	* Pros: Simple, straightforward implementation.
	* Cons: May be prone to errors if not implemented correctly, especially for complex formatting scenarios.
2. **Alternative manual formatting (getFormattedDurationB)**:
	* Pros: Similar simplicity to getFormattedDurationA but with some minor improvements.
	* Cons: Still may be error-prone and lacks the features of more sophisticated libraries like Moment.js.
3. **Moment.js (getFormattedDurationC)**:
	* Pros: Robust, feature-rich library that handles various formatting scenarios correctly.
	* Cons: Requires additional dependencies, which may increase bundle sizes or slow down performance.

**Other considerations:**

The test case uses a duration object with hours, minutes, and seconds properties to demonstrate the different formatting approaches. The Moment.js approach is particularly interesting because it's using the `asMilliseconds()` method to convert the duration to milliseconds before passing it to the `format()` method.

**Library and its purpose:**

Moment.js is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It provides various features, including date and time formatting, parsing, and manipulation. In this test case, it's used to format time durations in a convenient and accurate way.

**JS feature or syntax:**

The test case uses a `duration` object with methods like `hours()`, `minutes()`, and `seconds()` to access its properties. This is likely an extension of the Moment.js library, which provides similar functionality for working with time durations.

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives for formatting time durations in JavaScript include:

1. Using built-in date and time methods (e.g., `Date.toLocaleTimeString()`).
2. Creating custom implementations using string manipulation.
3. Utilizing other libraries or frameworks that provide robust date and time handling, such as Luxon or Day.js.

These alternatives may have their own pros and cons, but they can be considered when evaluating the performance of different formatting approaches in JavaScript.

Related benchmarks:

duration format (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 23:50 vs 24:50

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

23:50

24:50

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one year ago):