Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash each & lodash map & native forEach
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash each vs lodash map vs native forEach
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var value = [{a: 30310}, {b: 100303}, {c: 3040494}, {d: 6542321}, {e: 13123531}]
Tests:
lodash each
_.each(value, function(v,i) {console.log(v)})
lodash map
_.map(value, function(v,i) {console.log(v)})
native forEach
value.forEach(function(v,i) {console.log(v)})
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash each
lodash map
native forEach
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. In this case, there are three test cases: `lodash each`, `lodash map`, and `native forEach`. The script preparation code is the same for all three test cases, which is a JavaScript array containing five objects with different values. **Options Compared** The options compared in this benchmark are: * Using Lodash's `each` method versus the native `forEach` method. * Using Lodash's `map` method versus the native `forEach` method. These two methods are often used to iterate over arrays or objects, but they have different syntax and performance characteristics. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Lodash's `each` method**: Pros: + Easier to read and write, especially for those familiar with Lodash's API. + May be faster due to optimized native code generated by Lodash. Cons: + Adds extra overhead from the Lodash library. + May not be as efficient as the native `forEach` method. * **Native `forEach` method**: Pros: + No additional library overhead. + May be more efficient than the Lodash `each` method due to optimized native code. Cons: + More verbose syntax, especially for complex iterations. + May require more manual bookkeeping of iteration state. **Lodash Library** In this benchmark, Lodash is used in two ways: `each` and `map`. Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a set of utility functions for common tasks. In this context, it's being used to provide a convenient API for iterating over arrays or objects. The `each` method applies a function to each element in the array, while the `map` method creates a new array with the results of applying a function to each element. **Native JavaScript Features** In this benchmark, the native JavaScript `forEach` method is used, which is a built-in language feature that allows iterating over arrays or objects. This method is optimized for performance and doesn't require any additional libraries or overhead. Other Alternatives There are other alternatives for iterating over arrays or objects in JavaScript, such as: * For...of loop: A newer syntax for iterating over arrays or objects. * Array.prototype.reduce(): A method that applies a function to each element in an array and accumulates a result. * Set.iterate(): A method that iterates over the elements of a set. However, these alternatives may not be as widely supported or optimized as the native `forEach` method.
Related benchmarks:
lodash each & lodash map & native forEach no console log
lodash each & lodash map & native forEach return v
lodash each & lodash map & native forEach & native map return v
JS ForEach Tests
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?