Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jQuery $.each() VS $().onevent()
(version: 0)
jQuery each VS on event on multiple items
Comparing performance of:
each vs onevent
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div><div>aa/</div>
Script Preparation code:
var items = $('div');
Tests:
each
$.each(items, function(itemKey,$item) { $item.on('click', function() { console.log(this); }) });
onevent
items.on('click', function() { console.log(this); } );
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
each
onevent
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to attach an event listener to multiple elements using jQuery: `$.each()` and `$().onevent()`. The goal is to measure which approach is faster. **Options Compared** 1. **$.each()**: This method iterates over the array of elements using a callback function, applying the event listener to each element individually. 2. **$().onevent()**: This method attaches an event listener to all elements in the jQuery object and then calls `onevent()` on the resulting object. However, this is not a valid jQuery method (it should be `$().on('event')` or simply `$().each()`). **Pros and Cons** 1. **$.each()**: * Pros: more traditional and straightforward approach, allows for easy removal of event listeners. * Cons: can be slower due to the overhead of iterating over the elements individually. 2. **$().onevent()**: Not a valid jQuery method, so it's not possible to use this approach. **Library and Purpose** There is no external library being used in this benchmark. The test relies solely on jQuery's built-in functionality. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None mentioned in the provided code snippets. **Benchmark Preparation Code and HTML** The preparation code creates a jQuery object containing multiple `<div>` elements, which will be the target for attaching event listeners. **Other Considerations** When working with large datasets, `$.each()` can become inefficient due to its overhead. However, when dealing with small datasets or where performance is not critical, this approach might be more readable and maintainable. **Alternative Approaches** 1. **Using `$().on('event')`**: This method attaches an event listener to all elements in the jQuery object using a single line of code. 2. **Using `forEach()`**: Modern browsers support the `forEach()` method on arrays, which can be used to iterate over the elements and attach event listeners more efficiently. In conclusion, the benchmark is comparing two outdated approaches to attaching event listeners to multiple elements using jQuery. The `$().onevent()` approach is not a valid method, and the `$.each()` method has its own trade-offs in terms of performance and readability.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery $.each() VS $().onevent()
JQuery: find vs selector vs scoped selector - Class
JQuery: find vs selector vs scoped selector - Attr
JQuery DOM Traversal vs JQuery Selectors
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?