Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
access
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
array vs object
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
array
const id = 245445; const array = []; array[id] = 4556;
object
const id = 245445; const obj = {}; obj[id] = 4556;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array
object
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to test two different approaches for accessing an object property by its index: using an array or an object directly. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **"array"**: This test case uses a JavaScript array and accesses its element at index 245445, assigning the value 4556 to it. 2. **"object"**: This test case uses a plain JavaScript object and assigns a value to an existing property (not creating a new one) with the same key as in the array test case. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: 1. **Array-based access**: Using an array to store the index and its corresponding value. 2. **Object-based access**: Directly accessing an object's property using its name as the index. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Array-based access**: + Pros: Can be faster, especially for large arrays, since indexing is typically a direct operation. + Cons: Requires more memory to store the array, which can lead to slower performance due to garbage collection overhead. * **Object-based access**: + Pros: More memory-efficient, as only the object's property name needs to be stored, reducing overhead from garbage collection. + Cons: Can be slower for large objects or complex lookups, since JavaScript has to resolve the property name to its corresponding value. **Library and Special JS Features** Neither of these test cases uses a library. They rely on basic JavaScript syntax: * No special features like async/await, promises, or generators are used. * The `const` keyword is used for declaring variables, which is a standard feature in modern JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** While this benchmark focuses on accessing an object property by its index, other alternatives might include: 1. **Using `Map` instead of arrays**: If you need to store and look up values using unique keys, `Map` could be a more efficient option. 2. **Using a library like Lodash or Ramda**: These libraries provide utility functions for working with arrays and objects, which might impact performance. 3. **Using other data structures**: Depending on the specific requirements, other data structures like sets or graph-based data structures might be suitable alternatives. The benchmark provided by MeasureThat.net is designed to help users understand the performance implications of accessing object properties using different approaches, allowing them to make informed decisions about their JavaScript code's optimization and architecture.
Related benchmarks:
Timepass
TEST FLDNJFLNDLFNDLNFDNFLDS
match vs include vs indexOf
test vs include vs indexOf
Object access method
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?