Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash replace
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Native
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Lodash
console.log(_.intersection([1, 2, 3], [101, 2, 1, 10], [2, 1]))
Native
var arrays = [[1, 2, 3], [101, 2, 1, 10], [2, 1]]; console.log(arrays.reduce(function(a, b) { return a.filter(function(value) { return b.includes(value); }); }));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents a benchmark test for two different approaches to find the intersection of arrays: using the popular utility library Lodash and a native JavaScript implementation. **Options Compared** There are two main options being compared: 1. **Lodash**: The first option uses the `_.intersection()` method from Lodash, a popular JavaScript library that provides a set of useful functions for array manipulation. 2. **Native JavaScript**: The second option uses a native JavaScript implementation to find the intersection of arrays. **Pros and Cons** **Lodash** Pros: * Faster execution time: Lodash is optimized for performance and can execute faster than the native JavaScript implementation. * Easier to read and maintain: Using a well-tested library like Lodash can make the code easier to understand and maintain. * Reduced chance of errors: The library has already been tested and validated, reducing the likelihood of introducing bugs into your code. Cons: * Additional dependency: By using Lodash, you're introducing an additional dependency that needs to be included in your project (in this case, a 4MB file). * Potential security risks: If not used properly, Lodash can introduce security vulnerabilities if you're not careful when loading the library. **Native JavaScript** Pros: * No dependencies: Native JavaScript implementation doesn't require any external libraries or dependencies. * Complete control: You have complete control over the implementation and can optimize it to your specific needs. * Security: Using native JavaScript means you don't need to worry about potential security risks associated with loading an external library. Cons: * More complex code: Implementing a native JavaScript solution requires more boilerplate code, which can make it harder to read and maintain. * Potential performance issues: Without proper optimization, the native JavaScript implementation might not be as fast as Lodash. **Library (Lodash)** The `_.intersection()` method in Lodash takes two arrays as input and returns a new array containing only the elements that are common to both. It uses a simple algorithm to find the intersection: 1. Create an empty object. 2. Iterate over each element in the first array, using it as a key in the object. 3. Check if the value associated with the current key exists in the second array. 4. If it does, add the key-value pair to a result array. **Special JS Feature (or syntax)** There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark test. **Other Alternatives** If you want to explore other alternatives, here are a few: * Using `Array.prototype.filter()` and `Array.prototype.includes()`: This is another native JavaScript implementation that finds the intersection of two arrays using the `filter()` method. * Using a custom implementation with `Set` data structure: You can use `Set` to find the intersection of two arrays by iterating over each element in one array, adding it to the set if it's present in both arrays. In conclusion, the benchmark test is comparing the performance of using Lodash and native JavaScript implementations for finding the intersection of arrays. While Lodash provides a faster execution time, you need to consider the additional dependency and potential security risks. The native JavaScript implementation gives you complete control but requires more boilerplate code and might not be as fast without optimization.
Related benchmarks:
isFunction vs typeof function 6
isEmpty vs. vanilla
asdasdjkh askjdjkasdkjasd
topkek
Lodash isString fork
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?