Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
aoA6ApW486QVzbnDH8DbTzRJQgUzwPmq
(version: 2)
Comparing performance of:
A vs B vs C
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="row" style="display:none"> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> <div class="x-frame"> <div class="x-hit"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> <div class="x-block"> <div class="x-overlay"></div> </div> </div> </div>
Tests:
A
$('.x-frame').each(function() { $(this).children('.x-hit').children('.x-overlay').text('H') $(this).children('.x-block').children('.x-overlay').text('B') });
B
$('.x-frame').each(function() { $(this).find('.x-hit > .x-overlay').text('H') $(this).find('.x-block > .x-overlay').text('B') });
C
$('.x-frame > .x-hit > .x-overlay').text('H') $('.x-frame > .x-block > .x-overlay').text('B')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
A
B
C
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** MeasureThat.net is a platform for creating and running JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark is designed to test the performance of different DOM manipulation techniques using jQuery. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is an HTML fragment that defines a container element with multiple nested elements, each containing a child element with text content 'H' or 'B'. This structure is used to test various levels of DOM traversal and selection. **Individual Test Cases** There are three individual test cases: 1. **A**: This test case uses the `each` method to iterate over all elements with the class `x-frame`, and then traverses each element's child elements to update their text content. 2. **B**: Similar to test case A, but uses the `find` method to select specific child elements instead of relying on `each`. 3. **C**: This test case uses a more concise syntax to target specific elements by index (e.g., `.x-frame > .x-hit > .x-overlay`). It only updates two elements. **Comparison of DOM Manipulation Techniques** The benchmark compares the performance of different DOM manipulation techniques: * **Method 1** (test cases A and B): Using `each` and traversing child elements using `children()` or `find()`. This method can be slower due to the additional traversal steps. * **Method 2** (test case C): Directly targeting specific elements by index. This method is often faster because it avoids unnecessary traversal. **Pros and Cons** * **Method 1**: Pros: easier to understand and maintain, provides a safe way to iterate over elements. Cons: may be slower due to additional traversal steps. * **Method 2**: Pros: can be faster due to reduced traversal steps, but requires careful indexing to avoid errors. Cons: more prone to mistakes if not used correctly. **Library and Purpose** The `$.each()` method is a jQuery function that iterates over an array-like object or DOM elements, executing a provided callback function for each element. In this benchmark, it's used to iterate over the `.x-frame` elements. No other libraries are explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, jQuery is widely used for its convenience and efficiency in DOM manipulation tasks. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The `$.find()` method is a jQuery function that searches through the set of matched elements and returns all elements that match a specified selector or condition. In this benchmark, it's used to target specific child elements (e.g., `.x-hit > .x-overlay`). No other special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in the benchmark definition. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative ways to optimize DOM manipulation performance, consider: * Using `querySelectorAll()` and `forEach()` instead of `each()`. * Leveraging modern CSS selectors (e.g., `.x-frame > .x-hit > .x-overlay`) for more efficient selection. * Avoiding unnecessary reflows or repaints using techniques like lazy loading or memoization. Keep in mind that performance optimizations should always be tailored to the specific use case and requirements of your application.
Related benchmarks:
1dshvdshvhdsv
wyygoUfhcrzEqJb8aQVZyF2PFTky4fDV
getElementsByClassName, querySelector
getElementsByClassName, querySelector
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?