Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
getAttribute vs attributes
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
getAttribute vs attributes
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Registered User
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="foo" data-episode="000000000"></div>
Tests:
getAttribute
var element = document.getElementById("foo"); var i = 1000; while (i--) { element.getAttribute("data-episode"); }
attributes
var element = document.getElementById("foo"); var i = 1000; while (i--) { element.attributes["data-episode"].value; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
getAttribute
attributes
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
9 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/141.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/141.0.0.0
Browser/OS:
Chrome 141 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
getAttribute
15K/s
attributes
5K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
getAttribute
14,962 Ops/sec
attributes
4,890 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is tested on the provided JSON?** The provided JSON represents two test cases for measuring the performance difference between using `getAttribute` and accessing attributes directly (`element.attributes["data-episode"].value`) in JavaScript. In each test case, a HTML element with an ID of "foo" and a data attribute named "data-episode" is created. A variable `i` is initialized to 1000, and then a while loop iterates from 0 to 999. In each iteration, either `getAttribute` or direct attribute access is executed on the element. **Options compared:** Two options are being compared: 1. **Using `getAttribute`:** * This method retrieves the value of an attribute by its name using the `getAttribute` function. 2. **Direct attribute access (`element.attributes["data-episode"].value`):** * This method accesses the value of a property on the element's attributes object, using the dot notation. **Pros and Cons:** **Using `getAttribute`:** Pros: * Easy to use and understand * Works across different browsers and versions Cons: * Can be slower due to the overhead of calling a function * May involve more CPU cycles compared to direct attribute access **Direct attribute access (`element.attributes["data-episode"].value`):** Pros: * Directly accesses the attribute value without the overhead of a function call * Can be faster and more efficient for large-scale applications Cons: * Requires knowledge of the element's attributes object * May not work across all browsers or versions (e.g., older browsers may not support this syntax) **Library:** None explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The use of dot notation (`element.attributes["data-episode"].value`) is a common JavaScript practice, but it's not specific to any particular feature or syntax. It's simply a way to access property values on objects. **Other alternatives:** If you want to test other approaches, here are some alternatives: * Using `DOMException` to retrieve attribute values (instead of `getAttribute`) * Using the `getAttribute` function with the `name` parameter (e.g., `element.getAttribute("data-episode")`) * Using a library like jQuery or Lodash to simplify attribute access * Using other methods, such as using a regular expression or string manipulation functions Keep in mind that the specific alternatives and their performance impact will depend on the specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks
element.getAttribute("name") vs element.attributes.name.value
dataset vs getAttribute speed
getAttribute('data-foo') vs dataset.foo
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?