Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash sumBy string vs array vs function
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
sumBy with function vs sumBy with array vs sumBy with string
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = []; for(var i = 0; i < 100; i++){ arr.push({a: {b:1}}); }
Tests:
sumBy with function
_.sumBy(arr, (item) => item.a.b)
sumBy with array
_.sumBy(arr, ["a", "b"])
sumBy with string
_.sumBy(arr, "a.b")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
sumBy with function
sumBy with array
sumBy with string
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark tests three different approaches to calculate the sum of values in an array using Lodash, a popular utility library for JavaScript. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark consists of a single script preparation code that creates an array of objects with a nested property `a.b`. The HTML preparation code includes the Lodash library version 4.17.5. **Test Cases** There are three individual test cases: 1. **sumBy with function**: This test case uses the `_sumBy` function from Lodash, passing a custom function `(item) => item.a.b` as an argument. 2. **sumBy with array**: This test case uses the `_sumBy` function from Lodash, passing an array `[\"a\", \"b\"]` as an argument. 3. **sumBy with string**: This test case uses the `_sumBy` function from Lodash, passing a string `"a.b"` as an argument. **Options Compared** The three test cases compare the execution time of the `sumBy` function with different approaches: * Using a custom function `(item) => item.a.b` * Using an array `[\"a\", \"b\"]` as an argument * Using a string `"a.b"` as an argument **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: 1. **Custom Function**: This approach provides the most flexibility, allowing developers to choose the most efficient way to extract values from the object. * Pros: Flexibility, potential for better performance * Cons: May require additional setup or optimization 2. **Array Argument**: Passing an array as an argument allows Lodash to use a more optimized approach, potentially reducing execution time. * Pros: Optimized for performance, easy to implement * Cons: Limited flexibility, may not work with all object structures 3. **String Argument**: Using a string as an argument is the simplest way to access values from an object, but it may be slower due to the overhead of parsing and splitting the string. * Pros: Easy to implement, simple to read * Cons: Potential performance issues, less flexible **Lodash Library** Lodash is a utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object transformation, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash is used for its `_sumBy` function, which calculates the sum of values in an array by applying a provided function to each element. **JavaScript Feature/Syntax** There's no specific JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that requires special attention. **Alternative Approaches** For calculating the sum of values in an array without using Lodash, developers can use built-in JavaScript methods like `reduce()` or `forEach()`. However, these approaches might not be as optimized for performance as the ones provided by Lodash. Here's a basic example using `reduce()`: ```javascript let arr = []; for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { arr.push({a: {b:1}}); } let sum = arr.reduce((acc, item) => acc + item.a.b, 0); console.log(sum); // Output: the sum of values in the array ``` Keep in mind that this approach is less optimized for performance compared to using Lodash's `_sumBy` function.
Related benchmarks:
push vs. Index write performance
Push vs Spread JavaScript
Array add vs .unshift()
set.get(with new set) vs native include vs lodash include
set.get(with new set) vs native include vs lodash include in small data scale
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?