Benchmark: for x of array & for k in object

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {}
var arr = [] 
for (var i = 0; i<100000; i++) {
   var val = Math.random()
   obj[i] = val
   arr[i] = val
}
var wtf
function loopObj () {
  for (var k in obj) {
    wtf = obj[k]
  }
}

function loopArr () {
  for (var val of arr) {
    wtf = val
  }
}

console.log('prepare=> obj =', obj, '; arr =', arr)

Tests:

for key in object
for (var k in obj) { wtf = obj[k] }
for val of array
for (var val of arr) { wtf = val }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for key in object
for val of array

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested on the provided JSON and explain the different approaches compared, along with their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark is comparing two approaches:

1. `for (var k in obj) { ... }`: This approach iterates over an object using its own property names as keys.
2. `for (var val of arr) { ... }`: This approach iterates over an array using a feature called "foreach" or "for...of" loops.

**Comparison:**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two approaches on a large object and an array.

**Options Compared:**

* Iterating over an object using its own property names as keys (`for (var k in obj) { ... }`)
* Iterating over an array using a "foreach" or "for...of" loop (`for (var val of arr) { ... }`)

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Iterating over an object:**
	* Pros:
		+ May be more efficient for objects with a large number of properties, since the engine can use an index lookup to iterate.
		+ Can be used to iterate over object properties in a specific order (e.g., alphabetically).
	* Cons:
		+ Requires the property names to exist and not be deleted during iteration.
		+ May have performance issues if the object has a large number of properties that are frequently added or removed.
2. **Iterating over an array:**
	* Pros:
		+ More efficient for arrays, since it uses optimized C code under the hood.
		+ Does not require the elements to exist and can be used even after the array is destroyed.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires support for the "foreach" or "for...of" loop feature.
		+ May have performance issues if the array is very large.

**Library:**

None. The benchmark does not use any external libraries or frameworks.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax:**

The benchmark uses the "foreach" or "for...of" loop feature, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This syntax allows iterating over arrays and other iterable objects without using traditional indexing methods.

**Other Considerations:**

* The benchmark generates a large object and array using random values.
* The benchmark uses the `wtf` variable for no apparent reason, possibly as a placeholder or to test the effects of variable scope.
* The benchmark does not account for any potential side effects of iterating over these data structures (e.g., modifying the original object or array).

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives for iterating over objects and arrays include:

* Traditional indexing methods (e.g., `obj[k]` and `arr[i]`)
* Using a library like Lodash to iterate over objects and arrays
* Using a framework like React or Angular that provides optimized iteration mechanisms

Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches can vary depending on the specific use case, data structure, and JavaScript engine being used.

Related benchmarks:

for x of array & for k in object (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: for key in object vs for val of array

Created: 6 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

for key in object

for val of array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):