Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test1123
(version: 0)
nothing
Comparing performance of:
JQuery vs Custom selector
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.min.js"></script> <div class="foo">Hello World</div>
Script Preparation code:
function $q(selector) { return document.querySelectorAll(selector); }
Tests:
JQuery
var el = $('.foo');
Custom selector
var el = $q('.foo');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JQuery
Custom selector
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing two different approaches to select an HTML element using JavaScript: 1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library that provides a convenient way to interact with the DOM. 2. **Custom selector**: A custom implementation of the CSS selector syntax, as seen in the `jq` function provided during script preparation. **Options being compared** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches: * jQuery (option 1) * Custom selector (option 2) **Pros and Cons** ### jQuery Pros: * Widely used and well-maintained library * Fast and efficient implementation * Easy to use for complex DOM manipulations Cons: * Adds an additional dependency (the jQuery library itself) that can impact execution time * May have overhead due to its extensive feature set and caching mechanisms ### Custom selector Pros: * No additional dependencies or overhead * Can be optimized for specific use cases and performance requirements * Allows for fine-grained control over the selection process Cons: * Requires manual implementation of the CSS selector syntax, which can be error-prone and time-consuming * May not be as efficient as jQuery's internal implementation **Library: jq** The `jq` function is a custom implementation of the CSS selector syntax. It's likely designed to provide a lightweight alternative to jQuery's selector functionality. **Special JS feature or syntax** This benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries or frameworks for DOM manipulation, some popular options include: * Vanilla JavaScript (using native DOM methods) * React or other frontend frameworks that provide their own set of DOM-related APIs * Other CSS selector libraries like Sizzle or FastSelect Keep in mind that each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preferences.
Related benchmarks:
test112
test1114
test11145
test11146
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?