Benchmark: Lodash 3.10.1 Every vs Native Every

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/3.10.1/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var value = [{a: 30310}, {b: 100303}, {c: 3040494}]

Tests:

lodash.every
_.every(value, (v,i) => {})
native every
value.every((v,i) => {})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash.every
native every

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 138 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash.every	94069976.0 Ops/sec
native every	1698989056.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two implementations of the `every` function: one using Lodash (a JavaScript utility library) and another using native JavaScript syntax.

**Lodash 3.10.1 Every vs Native Every**

The Lodash implementation is used for version 3.10.1, which is a widely-used version of the library. The native implementation uses the standard JavaScript `every` method, without any additional libraries or modifications.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **Lodash every**: This option uses the `lodash.every` function from the Lodash library.
2. **Native Every**: This option uses the built-in `every` method of JavaScript arrays.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* **Lodash every**: Pros:
	+ Uses a widely-used and well-maintained library (Lodash).
	+ May be optimized for performance by the Lodash team.
Cons:
	+ Adds an extra dependency to the benchmark, as it relies on Lodash being loaded.
	+ May introduce additional overhead due to the size of the Lodash library.
* **Native Every**: Pros:
	+ Does not add any dependencies, as it only uses built-in JavaScript methods.
	+ Is likely to be faster and more lightweight than the Lodash implementation.
Cons:
	+ May require more manual optimization and tuning for optimal performance.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for various tasks, such as array manipulation, string normalization, and functional programming. In this benchmark, the `lodash.every` function is used to check if all elements in an array satisfy a given condition.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax: None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. Both implementations use standard JavaScript methods and syntax.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative implementations of the `every` function, here are some options:

1. **ES6 every**: This is a built-in method in modern JavaScript environments that can be used to check if all elements in an array satisfy a given condition.
2. **Arrow functions with reduce**: It's possible to use arrow functions and the `reduce` method to implement the `every` function, which might lead to different results due to optimizations or performance characteristics.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as widely supported or optimized as the Lodash implementation or the native JavaScript `every` method.

Related benchmarks:

Lodash 3.10.1 Every vs Native Every (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash.every vs native every

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash.every

native every

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):