Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.assign vs spread operatordd
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.assign vs spread operator
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.assign
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
spread operator
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two ways of merging objects in JavaScript: `Object.assign()` and the spread operator (`...`). **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **`Object.assign()`**: This test case uses the `Object.assign()` method to merge an object with a new object containing some properties. ```javascript var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params); ``` The idea is to create a new object by copying the `a` property from the first object and merging the rest of the properties from the second object. Pros: * Simple and straightforward * Widely supported in older browsers Cons: * Can lead to shallow copies, which might not be what you want (e.g., arrays are copied as references) * Can be slower due to the need for a loop or array method 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This test case uses the spread operator to merge an object with a new object containing some properties. ```javascript var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 }; var other = { a: 2, ...params }; ``` The idea is to create a new object by copying all properties from the first object and merging them into the second object. Pros: * More concise and readable * Creates shallow copies of arrays as required Cons: * Might not work in older browsers that don't support the spread operator * Can be slower due to the need for additional checks or array method calls **Library Used** None, this is a pure JavaScript benchmark. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). It's supported in modern browsers and Node.js versions, but not in older browsers or environments that don't support ES2018. **Other Alternatives** If you're working with older browsers or environments that don't support the spread operator, you can use other methods to merge objects, such as: * `Object.assign()`: As mentioned earlier * `for...in` loop: Iterate over the properties of one object and add them to another using a `for...in` loop. * `Array.prototype.concat()`: Create an array of property values from each object and then use `Array.prototype.concat()` to merge them into a new array. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as concise or readable as the spread operator, but they can still get the job done.
Related benchmarks:
toFixed -> Number vs Math.round
toFixed() vs Math.round().toString()
toFixed() vs String(Math.floor()
toFixed vs Math.round() with numbers222
Instanceof VS toString for date comparison when using objects
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?