Benchmark: Moment Parse vs JS Manual Parse

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.9.0/moment.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var timestamp = "21/06/1994 09:09"

Tests:

Moment Parse
return moment(timestamp, "DD/MM/YYYY hh:mm").unix();
JS Manual Parse
var timeSplit = timestamp.split("/"); var timeTrimp = timeSplit[2].split(" "); var date = new Date(timeTrimp[0] + "/" + timeSplit[1] + "/" + timeSplit[0] + " " + timeTrimp[1]).getTime() / 1000; return date;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Moment Parse
JS Manual Parse

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches to parse dates:

1. **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times.
2. **JavaScript Manual Parse**: A simple, manual approach using only JavaScript without any external libraries.

**Library: Moment.js**

Moment.js is a lightweight, widely-used library that provides an easy-to-use API for date and time manipulation. It's designed to handle various date formats, including the one used in the benchmark (DD/MM/YYYY hh:mm). The `moment()` function is used to parse dates from strings, and it returns an object with various methods for manipulating the date.

**Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Moment Parse**: This test case uses Moment.js to parse the provided timestamp string (`21/06/1994 09:09`) and returns the Unix timestamp (the number of seconds since January 1, 1970, UTC) in milliseconds.
2. **JS Manual Parse**: This test case performs manual parsing using JavaScript without any external libraries. It splits the timestamp string into parts, constructs a Date object, and then calculates the Unix timestamp.

**Approach Comparison**

Both approaches have their pros and cons:

* **Moment.js (Moment Parse)**:
	+ Pros: Lightweight, easy to use, handles various date formats out of the box.
	+ Cons: External dependency (library), might be overkill for simple parsing needs.
* **JavaScript Manual Parse**:
	+ Pros: No external dependencies, can be faster since it doesn't involve library overhead.
	+ Cons: Requires manual handling of date formats and edge cases.

**Other Considerations**

When deciding between these approaches, consider the following:

* If you need to handle multiple date formats or perform complex date calculations, Moment.js might be a better choice due to its simplicity and ease of use.
* For simple parsing needs, JavaScript Manual Parse can be faster since it doesn't involve library overhead.

**Benchmark Results**

The latest benchmark results show that:

* **JS Manual Parse**: Chrome 96 on Desktop (Windows) achieves approximately 1024 executions per second.
* **Moment Parse**: Same configuration as above achieves approximately 1113 executions per second.

This suggests that, in this specific case, the manual parsing approach using JavaScript is slightly faster than using Moment.js. However, please note that this result may vary depending on your specific use case and environment.

Related benchmarks:

Moment Parse vs JS Manual Parse (version: 0)

Moment Parse vs JS Manual Parse

Comparing performance of: Moment Parse vs JS Manual Parse

Created: 6 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Moment Parse

JS Manual Parse

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):