filter-map vs reduce (version: 0)

modified version of `map-filter vs reduce` that switches the order of operations

Comparing performance of: map-filter vs reduce

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 188 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 157 runs
map-filter
30K/s
reduce
10K/s

Fastest: map-filter (3.0x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ map-filter: 30,000 ops/sec
  • • reduce: 9,879 ops/sec
Firefox 17 runs
map-filter
131K/s
reduce
121K/s
View exact numbers
  • ✓ map-filter: 131,325 ops/sec
  • • reduce: 120,713 ops/sec
Mobile Results:
Safari 8 runs
map-filter
49K/s
reduce
40K/s

Fastest: map-filter (1.2x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ map-filter: 49,433 ops/sec
  • • reduce: 40,126 ops/sec
Chrome 6 runs
map-filter
23K/s
reduce
13K/s

Fastest: map-filter (1.7x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ map-filter: 22,827 ops/sec
  • • reduce: 13,186 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    map-filter
    reduce

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 YaBrowser/25.8.0.0 Safari/537.36
Yandex Browser 25 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
reduce
59K/s
map-filter
51K/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ reduce 59,169 Ops/sec
map-filter 51,300 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks