Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Dom vs DomFragments vs Hybrid
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
DOM vs DomFragment vs hybrid
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
DOM
const test = document.createElement('div') test.innerHTML = '<div>foo bar</div>' document.body.append(...test.childNodes)
DomFragment
const test = document.createRange().createContextualFragment('<div>foo bar</div>') document.body.append(test)
hybrid
const test1 = document.createElement('div') const test2 = document.createRange().createContextualFragment('<div>foo bar</div>') test1.append(test2) document.body.append(...test1.childNodes)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
DOM
DomFragment
hybrid
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what is being tested in the provided JSON. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition specifies three different approaches for appending child nodes to a `div` element: 1. **DOM (Document Object Model)**: This approach uses the standard DOM API, where the `innerHTML` property is set directly on the `div` element. 2. **DomFragment**: This approach uses the `createRange().createContextualFragment()` method, which creates a new fragment that contains a range of elements. The fragment is then appended to the document body. 3. **Hybrid**: This approach first creates a child node using `document.createElement()`, appends another child node (which is created using `createRange().createContextualFragment()`) to it, and finally appends the resulting hybrid node to the document body. **Options Compared** The three approaches are compared in terms of their performance, specifically: * Execution speed (`ExecutionsPerSecond` value) * Browser-specific details (e.g., Firefox 95) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **DOM**: Pros: * Simple and straightforward implementation * Easy to understand and maintain Cons: * May be slower due to DOM node creation and manipulation 2. **DomFragment**: Pros: + Faster execution speed (due to optimized fragment creation) + Reduced memory allocation and deallocation Cons: + More complex implementation + Requires a specific API (`createRange().createContextualFragment()`) 3. **Hybrid**: Pros: + Combines the benefits of both approaches (DOM and DomFragment) + Can be more flexible in terms of node creation and manipulation Cons: + More complex implementation compared to DOM + Requires additional nodes and operations, which can increase overhead **Library and Purpose** The `createRange()` method is part of the W3C Standard (HTML5), and it creates a range object that represents a subset of elements in an HTML document. The `createContextualFragment()` method is also part of the W3C Standard (HTML5) and is used to create a new fragment that contains a range of elements. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There is no specific JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark, but it's worth noting that `createRange().createContextualFragment()` is an optimized method that takes advantage of the browser's internal fragment caching mechanism. This optimization can lead to faster execution times compared to creating and manipulating DOM nodes directly. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches or want to explore different use cases, you could consider: * Using a library like `jsdom` or `puppeteer` to simulate browser behavior in Node.js * Investigating other HTML fragment creation methods, such as `document.createDocumentFragment()` * Comparing performance with other browsers, such as Chrome or Safari Keep in mind that the specific use case and requirements will influence the choice of approach.
Related benchmarks:
querySelector vs. getElementsByClassName nested dom
DOMParser vs createContextualFragment vs innerHTML vs insertAdjacentHTML vs createContextualFragment Polyfill 2 Large HTML
querySelectorAll() vs getElementsByTagName()
querySelectorAll() vs getElementsByTagName() - with constant length
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?